Dust on landing, gas on letting go, and a lander that stays let go
One particle system, three uses now: a lander coming apart, dust kicked up by a landing, and gas out of a docking port on release. Where they start, how fast they go, what colour they are and how long they last are arguments; everything else is shared. Dust goes sideways and UP off the lander's feet, because that is where kicked dust goes and there is ground in the way of the rest of it. Gas goes evenly in every direction, because nothing is in the way of a docking port. Neither happens on docking - a dock is a catch and not a touchdown, and there is nothing under it to kick. ---- Ticked from the frame loop, not run in place ---- The explosion can afford to stop the world; there is nothing left to fly. The undocking puff cannot, because it goes off on the frame a thruster is pressed, and freezing a quarter of a second exactly then is felt as the controls sticking. So a burst advances one frame at a time from the main loop, and the two that can afford to wait just pump that same tick until the air is clear. ---- And letting go did not let go ---- Which the puff is what found. A docked lander sits EXACTLY one tile under the station, so releasing upwards moved it towards the station and it docked again on the very next frame: took the fuel again, said so again, and waited to be told the message had been read - which reads as the controls locking up the instant they are used. It has to get clear now before it can take hold again, and the two distances have to differ: docking wants one tile, re-arming wants two. A single distance re-armed on the frame it let go, because a tile is exactly where it was sitting. Three checks, each seen to fail on its own break. The last of them measures HOW FAR the lander has got and not merely that it moved: a sixteen frame pause on release still leaves it climbing, four rows short of a free run, so "it moved" would pass for a stall that has been slept through.
This commit is contained in:
File diff suppressed because one or more lines are too long
Reference in New Issue
Block a user