The font comes from a chip, not from RAM that remembers
videoReset zeroed video memory and then wrote the font and the sixteen colour schemes into it, and the comment above that said out loud what was wrong with it: "everything here is ordinary video memory". RAM does not wake up with anything in it. That was the last piece of magic in this device, and it looked harmless until something wanted the font BACK - a program that redefines a glyph had destroyed the only copy there was. So the device has a character generator, the way the machines this one is pretending to be really did, and the copy into RAM is a thing it DOES rather than a state it mysteriously starts in. Command port 0x39: bit 0 for the font, bit 1 for the schemes. THE RAM IS STILL RAM. A program may overwrite every glyph and every colour and should be able to, which is what makes this a tile engine rather than a text display. What changed is that it is no longer a one way door. NEITHER COMMAND CLEARS WHAT IT DOES NOT OWN. The font used to clear the whole of tile memory before writing itself, which was harmless while it happened only at reset and is wrong the moment a program can ask: a program that defined a tile of its own and then wanted its text back would have paid for it with the tile. The reason it is a chip rather than a file on the disk, which was the other candidate: the boot chain prints before CosmOS exists. Stage one prints "?" when there is nothing to boot, and if the font came off the disk then the message about the disk having failed would be the one thing that could not be drawn. A system that wants its own font still loads one over the top - the ROM is the floor, not the policy. Two things that had been worked around now simply work. The shell asks for both whenever a program exits, so a program that redefined a letter no longer leaves it unable to spell, and Grid no longer needs to have saved the screen to avoid handing back green text on blue. And the fault screen asks for the glyphs first, because a message spelled in somebody's tile graphics is no message at all. Five video checks. Two runs each for the font and the schemes, since the map holds a tile NUMBER and the glyph is looked up when the frame is drawn - so restoring changes every cell using it, including ones drawn before, and what the two runs differ by is the command. The third guards the decision not to clear: tile 200 has to survive the font coming back. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01E2JrLzFvuFX9fgi1LDRjrW
This commit is contained in:
co-authored by
Claude Opus 5
parent
925388c2f2
commit
f97d15de08
@@ -735,6 +735,24 @@ The alternative was to let a write of 8 step the column and set the fine part to
|
||||
|
||||
**None of the four does anything in bitmap mode**, which has no map to slide.
|
||||
|
||||
### The Character Generator:
|
||||
|
||||
The font and the sixteen colour schemes come from a **ROM in the device**. Reset copies them into video memory, and Command port `0x39` copies them again on request:
|
||||
|
||||
| Port | Register |
|
||||
| --- | --- |
|
||||
| 0x39 | Command. Bit 0 asks for the font back, bit 1 for the sixteen schemes. Write only. |
|
||||
|
||||
**This used to be magic and now is not.** The glyphs were written into video RAM at reset and existed nowhere else, which looked harmless until something wanted the font *back*: RAM does not wake up with anything in it, and a program that redefined a glyph had destroyed the only copy there was. A machine with a character generator is what the machines this one is pretending to be actually had, and the copy into RAM is now a thing the device **does** rather than a state it mysteriously starts in.
|
||||
|
||||
The RAM is still RAM. A program may overwrite every glyph and every colour and should be able to - that is what makes this a tile engine rather than a text display. What changed is that doing so is no longer a one way door.
|
||||
|
||||
**Neither command clears what it does not own.** The font writes the 135 glyphs it has and stops, so a tile a program defined above them survives; the schemes write the two entries of each of the sixteen and stop, so a program's own colours in between survive. Asking for the font back must not cost a program the tile it was drawing with.
|
||||
|
||||
In bitmap mode the tiles *are* the picture, so asking for the font there draws glyphs across the top of it. That is not a case being ignored: it is what the memory means in that mode.
|
||||
|
||||
A system that wants a different font still loads one over the top. The ROM is the floor rather than the policy - it is what lets a machine with no disk say that it has no disk, and what lets a program with no system behind it put readable text on a screen.
|
||||
|
||||
### Writing On The Screen:
|
||||
|
||||
A console on a machine with a screen sends every byte to both, because a machine with a screen and a serial line is an ordinary machine and there is one console driving both.
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user