A mounted disk is EIGHT BYTES - where its directory starts, how many
blocks it is, how big the disk is, and where you are on it. They now sit
together in the data segment, and changing drives is one copy out and one
copy in. The other three thousand lines of filesystem go on reading the
same four names they always have and never learn there is more than one
disk, which is the whole reason this was affordable.
The version is not in the record. It is checked at mount and thrown away,
because a version one disk's zero parent already reads as "in the root".
Every drive is mounted at boot: the controller says how many are plugged
in and each is tried in turn. One with nothing in it, or a disk this
cannot read, is left unmounted rather than stopping the others, so a
machine with a good disk in drive 0 and a blank in drive 1 starts.
'drive' says which one, 'drive 1' goes to another, and the working
directory goes with it - where you are on a disk is part of which disk you
are on. A drive the machine has not got is refused, and refused
differently from one that is there with nothing readable in it.
Three things the assembly caught me on, all the same misunderstanding of
what survives a call:
- OR reads A and B, and the bit came back from sbfsDriveBit in Q, which
RET does not disturb - but RET does put A back. The mounted mask never
got set and drive 0 was reported unmountable.
- MVQA then RSTA throws away the copy it just made, so doubling a bit
doubled nothing. SHL does it in one instruction, because A and B are
one register to it.
- There is no move from A to B. INB reads a port straight into B, which
is what the drive count comparison wanted.
run.sh takes more than one image now, separated by a plus, since the
machine has four drives and a test that could only name one could not
check any of this.
The buffer note is forgotten on a drive change and that is DELIBERATELY
kept although nothing can currently reach it: only the file read-ahead
consults it, a directory scan does not, and finding a file requires a
scan which overwrites the note on the way past. Two disks were built with
the same file at the same block to try to catch it and the answer was
right either way. Three instructions to hold an invariant rather than a
story about a bug - and the comment says so instead of claiming a fix.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01E2JrLzFvuFX9fgi1LDRjrW
AnachronautandClaude Opus 5
5644c24113