Two things, one certain and one likely.
THE CERTAIN ONE IS NOT THE WINDOW'S FAULT. Snake's pause loop said "at the emulated rate
this is about an eighth of a second", and it was, when a cycle was one instruction. A cycle
became one memory access, every loop in the machine got dearer, and this one silently
doubled: the game has been running at half the speed it documents ever since, in a terminal
as much as in a window. Measured rather than guessed - the inner loop is a DECA and a BNA,
one byte and three, so four cycles a turn, and a whole run went from 3,848,610 cycles to
1,920,504 when the outer count came down from 256 to 122. Almost exactly half, which is what
the arithmetic said it would be.
That is the cost model change reaching a program nobody thought to re-measure. Worth looking
for others: any loop tuned by eye before that change is running at half its intended speed.
THE LIKELY ONE is the frame limiter. Without the vsync hint, Raylib sleeps towards sixty
frames a second on its own clock, which beats against a display refreshing on its own -
frames shown twice or skipped, and the machine handed an uneven number of cycles each time,
since it takes its budget from the wall clock. The hint puts presentation in step with the
screen. SetTargetFPS stays for a driver that ignores it.
Snake is one byte bigger, because RSTB became INIB.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01E2JrLzFvuFX9fgi1LDRjrW
AnachronautandClaude Opus 5
310804e267