AnachronautandClaude Opus 5
2abc8281df
while and for. Both only mean anything in a script, because a loop goes back to the line that opened it and a prompt has no line to go back to - and both say so rather than doing something surprising. THE SCRIPT READER KEEPS THE POSITION OF EVERY LINE before reading it, which is what makes any of this possible: by the time a line has been read the reader is past it, and a line is not a fixed size to subtract. Three words per line, and the block is read again on the way back so the pointer into it means what it meant - the same thing nesting one script inside another already did, for a different reason. THE TWO LOOPS END DIFFERENTLY, and that is the design rather than an accident. A while is taken away at its end and its own line asks the question again, so nothing has to be remembered. A for is not: how many words it has used is kept in the block, and its line reads itself again and counts one more off the front. That is a byte in a block instead of a copy of the word list in every one of them. Blocks grew from a byte to a record of sixteen - state, kind, words used, and where the line that opened it was - and sixteen because A and B are a shift register, so four rotations turn a block number into its offset. The history and the variables are addressed the same way for the same reason. Nested loops, an if inside a loop, a loop inside a branch nobody takes, and a for with no words: the last two run no times rather than once, which is the case worth having a test for. Three things found by running it: textSame asks whether two WHOLE strings are the same, so "in red green blue" is not "in". The word has to be split off before it is compared. A for typed at a prompt complained about while, because both arrive at the same place. One message that names neither is better than one that names the wrong one. And docs.sh caught a naming convention nobody had written down: it recognises a packed name by its label ending in "Name", so ForName2 was silently not counted. It failed the right way round - saying the run was shorter than the count claims rather than passing - but the convention now lives where the names are and not only in the checker. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01E2JrLzFvuFX9fgi1LDRjrW
5 lines
49 B
Plaintext
5 lines
49 B
Plaintext
do loops.script
|
|
while same a a
|
|
for x in a b
|
|
exit
|