main
2
Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 Anachronaut
|
9c144469b4 |
Take the SplitLint findings that are one operation, leave the rest
Twenty four more sites, and the interesting part is which ones were left alone. A rule emerged while reading them and it held all the way through: apply where the repetition is INSIDE one operation, skip where the author's own structure says it is a new thought, and never where two equal values mean different things. Taken: - Five registers reassigned to a value they already held, where both are the same quantity: two masks in one expression in Snake, two spaces printed by the monitor, both halves of block zero in waitTest, and a RSTA in Pour that the very next instruction overwrote. - Eighteen SETDs that reload a pointer inside one operation - a store back into the variable just read, or an INCD stepping to the second byte of a two byte value. Those read correctly without the reload. - sbfsNext, which branched to the label on the line below it. Left, with reasons that are the useful part of this: - Eight registers where the same number means two different things. CosmOS and the loader set A to 1 for a blit command and then to 1 again for a bank number; Asm compares a type against 3 and then a status against 3. Removing those couples one quantity to another that is equal by accident and would part company silently. - Ten RSTAs that open the RSTA/RSTB/CCF/ADD "return zero" block. The redundancy is what makes that idiom self contained; taking it out makes the return value depend on the line above. - Eleven SETDs that begin an arm of a comparison chain. Each arm loads, compares and branches, and they get reordered - the repetition is the reason a new arm can be dropped in anywhere. - Twenty five SETDs separated from their pointer by a blank line or a comment, which is the author saying a new thought starts here. - Two CCFs before arithmetic, which this codebase writes unconditionally. - Three redundant branches in test programs whose recorded output includes addresses, where three fewer bytes moves what the test demonstrates. Nine recorded outputs moved and every one is a size in a listing or, for Life, five more generations inside the same cycle budget. Behaviour is unchanged everywhere: cosmosSnake and cosmosEdit pass byte for byte while Snake loses eight bytes and Edit twelve. CosmOS is 10,902 bytes of program against 10,937, and the native assembler 12,173 against 12,183. The CosmOS README's size for Edit moved twice in one sitting, and this morning's check caught it both times - which it could not have done before that claim was reworded to name what it was about. |
||
|
Anachronaut
|
c3188ed657 |
Seventy becomes seventy one: a machine that can wait
HALT is terminal - stepCPU returns at once when the Halt Flag is up, so a halted machine does not execute, service devices, or take an interrupt - and that has to stay true, because every test ends with a halt and "halted" is how a program says it has finished. The consequence was that SplitBit had no way to wait at all. Every wait was a spin, and a spin is bus traffic: 11.5% of Type over a 14K file on a disk of ten thousand cycles, after read-ahead had already hidden three quarters of the latency. WAIT is 0xFE, one byte, no operands, sitting under HALT where the instruction that almost stops the machine belongs. Three decisions in it: - A line already standing means there is nothing to wait for, so WAIT does nothing. That is what makes test-then-wait race-free. - Any line ends the wait, masked or not, so a program can sleep on a device it has no handler for and read its status afterwards. Masking says who answers a request, not whether it happened. - A line that wakes the CPU without being dispatched is taken down by the WAIT. Left standing it would be found by the next WAIT, which would return at once - the program would spin exactly as before while looking as though it slept. Waiting is NOT a Status bit, and that is the trap avoided rather than a gap: Status rides into the interrupt frame and comes back out, so a machine interrupted mid-wait would return from its handler still waiting, and wait again for what it had already been given. An internal field instead. Idle cycles are counted apart from bus cycles and the halt line says so when there are any, which is what makes the difference observable at all - with the line-clearing removed the total moves by ONE cycle, 20,100 against 20,099, and only the idle half changes, halving to 9,976. A test on totals could never have seen it. Tests/terminal.sh asks that question, being the file for things a recorded output cannot see, and fails with the clear removed while "both reads finished" still passes. Three collisions, all found by building it: - 0xFE was the assembler's "not an instruction" sentinel. getOpcode now answers a negative NOT_AN_OPCODE, which is outside the range of every possible answer instead of inside the unused part of it. - 0xFE was also what faultTest and faultResumeTest executed to provoke a fault. They now use 0xFD and say why, because they did not fail when it became an instruction - they HUNG, having started sleeping instead. - Keys.asm has had a label called "wait" for a year, and mnemonics are matched uppercased. What that reported was "Branch without label" at the BRQ thirty lines away. The assembler now refuses a label that is already an instruction, at the label, by name; every instruction added takes a word out of the space of label names, so this will happen again. |