0x64 counted only the RECORDED pads. So a controller plugged into Voyager
reported its buttons perfectly, and every game asking whether there was a
controller was told no - which is exactly what Lunar Porter asked, once,
at startup, before falling back to the console for the rest of the run.
The cause is worth naming: a front end calls padSet every frame for every
pad, so "held nothing" is the commonest thing it says and cannot also mean
"there is no pad here". Connected is said separately now. Pad nought is
always there behind a window, because the keyboard is behind it - which is
the useful answer rather than the literal one.
And Pad.asm, which is what should have existed before any of that guessing
began. It prints a line whenever a pad changes, and tells apart the three
states that look identical from inside a game that will not respond: one
nobody noticed, one mapped to nothing, and a mapping that is wrong.
WHY A PROGRAM AND NOT A PRINT IN THE FRONT END: because the question is
what the MACHINE can see. A front end reporting what it thinks it is
sending answers a different question, and the gap between those two is the
whole of this bug.
It also found that osPrintNumber takes A as the HIGH half - the same way
round as the shift register and every other pair here, and not what a byte
in A wants. Every value came out 256 times too big.
Gravity is one frame in ten rather than six. The ratio between thrust and
gravity is the feel; how often the tick comes round is how fast that feel
arrives, and one in six was still touchy. Same lander, more time to think.
And the verdict waits for a key. It printed and left immediately, taking
the screen with it - so the one thing worth seeing, the lander sitting on
the ground it had just reached, was gone before it could be looked at.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01E2JrLzFvuFX9fgi1LDRjrW
The terrain is an array in Data Memory rather than something read back out
of the map, and that is the whole reason this is cheap: the ground under
the lander is one index into 128 bytes, where asking the screen would be a
transfer through the controller every frame.
The column is the world position over eight, masked to the moon's 128. The
surface is that column's row times eight - three turns left of the shift
register, since a row is at most 24 and 192 fits in the low half. The feet
are the lander's top plus its eight pixels.
WHAT DECIDES IS THE SPEED AT THE MOMENT IT ARRIVES. Both of them, and both
have to be gentle: three quarters of a pixel a frame downwards and half of
one sideways. Sideways is the tighter on purpose, because a landing that
was soft downwards and sliding is a lander on its side - which is the
interesting half of the difficulty, and the half the drift bar was blind
about until it existed.
Two fixtures say it works, and they differ only in what was held: one
holds nothing and falls the whole way, the other pulses the thruster six
frames in sixteen and survives. Same terrain, same seed, same keys.
Also: the gamepad did nothing, and the reason is that the four direction
buttons are the D-PAD. A lot of controllers made this century have one
nobody uses - the thumb goes on the stick, which reports as an axis rather
than a button - so a pad that was plugged in and working correctly did
nothing at all. The stick counts as held past halfway now. Untested here,
because there is no controller in this environment and the suite runs
headless; Voyager also says at startup which controllers it can see, so a
pad that still does nothing can be told apart from one nothing noticed.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01E2JrLzFvuFX9fgi1LDRjrW
AnachronautandClaude Opus 5