373454ec002e93ab3ea65b6be450c4ee2517be20
8
Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
  AnachronautandClaude Opus 5
|
bcd42e75ca |
Scroll the screen sideways, and by less than a cell
The screen could move one way, a cell at a time. Three registers were missing and this adds them: a column origin so the map can be wider than the screen as well as taller, and a pixel remainder for each axis so the step can be one pixel rather than eight. 0x36 Scroll column, in cells, wrapping at 128 0x37 Fine X, 0 to 7 pixels 0x38 Fine Y, 0 to 7 pixels FINE DOES NOT CARRY INTO COARSE. Writing 8 to a fine register writes 0, because only its low three bits mean anything. The alternative was for a write of 8 to step the coarse register, and it was rejected for one reason: a program that scrolls has to know where it has got to, and if the hardware carries then the only way to find out is to read the register back. Keeping them apart means the program already knows, because it did the arithmetic itself. It is also what the machines this one is pretending to be did. The renderer now draws one more row and one more column than fit and clips them, because with a fine offset the screen no longer begins on a cell boundary and the cells at two edges are partly off it. videoPutCell follows the column origin as it has always followed the row - a caller means a cell of the SCREEN, and the screen is a window onto the map. The fine offsets are deliberately not applied there: they move the finished picture by less than a cell, and there is no such thing as less than a cell to write into. So a program may scroll to any pixel without the console's idea of where row three, column five is moving underneath it. Grid now scrolls diagonally, a pixel a frame, in four port writes and two carries. It moved eight pixels every fourth frame before, which reads as the picture jumping rather than travelling. Seven checks, each one the same program with one register changed, so what is compared is where the picture stopped. Breaking fine X, fine Y, the column origin, the three-bit mask, or the console's use of the origin each fails exactly one of them. Grid's own two checks had to be rewritten, and the reason is worth keeping: they asked whether pixel 4 was a grid line, which was really a check that the scroll happened to be at a cell boundary. A picture that moves a pixel a frame can only be asked things that are true at every offset - that it repeats every eight pixels, and that one band of eight rows holds different colours from the next. Also repairs docs.sh, which found the minimal CosmOS application by taking the first asm block in the README. Documenting a program with an example above it made that a different block, and the check complained that the minimal application had no #Base about something that never claimed to be one. It looks under System Services now. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01E2JrLzFvuFX9fgi1LDRjrW |
||
|
AnachronautandClaude Opus 5
|
85329f13c3 |
Take a device's line down when its status port is read
A device raises a line and something has to take it down. Two things did: being interrupted, and being woken from WAIT with the Interrupt Flag down - the second because a masked program has nowhere to dispatch to, so nobody else would. There was a third way to learn a device had finished and nothing answered it. The documented idiom reads the status, branches out if the device is already done, and only WAITs otherwise; on a disk quick enough to finish before the first look, which is every disk here, the WAIT is unreachable. The line then stood for the rest of the machine's life. The program that leaves it standing never pays for it - it was masked throughout. The bill arrives at whoever next sets the Interrupt Flag. The boot chain reads the disk to load a program, leaves the line up, and hands over; the loaded program is then interrupted on behalf of a read that finished before it existed, through a vector table with no entry for a device it never touched, and faults on the instruction after its SIF. Found by running Examples/tune.asm through Once. It set up its whole sound and died four bytes before its first note, which is why it was silent rather than wrong - and why it looked like a sound bug for a while. So reading the port that answers a device takes its line down, the same way taking the byte already took the console's down. Disk and screen do it on their status port. And a reset now clears every line, which is the sentence the manual already makes about the vector table: a handler left behind aims an interrupt into a program that is no longer running, and so does a line. testPrograms/diskLineTest.asm pins it - the racy idiom, then SIF with no handler installed anywhere. It faults without the fix. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01E2JrLzFvuFX9fgi1LDRjrW |
||
|
AnachronautandClaude Opus 5
|
13b20c8834 |
Give the screen a bitmap mode
V4. Mode 2 is 320 by 200 with a byte a pixel: no tile to look up and no attribute to add, the byte IS the palette index. Programs/Examples/picture.asm fills a whole one in 127 bytes of program and 47,498 cycles. IT IS THE SAME MEMORY AS THE TILES AND THE MAP, which is what shared video memory has always been, and there is nowhere else it could be - 64,000 bytes of picture in a 65,536 byte bank leaves room for nothing beside it. Going to bitmap mode does not clear the text screen, it stops calling it one, and coming back finds the tiles holding whatever the picture put there. Taking the screen means taking it. The palette moves to 0xFC00, the top of video memory, because it is the one thing that has to mean the same in every mode and 64,000 bytes of picture leaves nowhere in the middle for it to hide. That is a documented address, so the example, the tests and the manual move with it. A BITMAP HAS NO COLUMNS AND NO ROWS, and both registers read zero rather than a leftover from the last mode. The console asks: told there is no character screen, it has nowhere to put a glyph and draws nothing, while still saying everything down the serial line. The honest alternative is what a machine with shared video memory really does, which is scribble marks nobody can read across somebody's picture - honest and useless, since a program that has taken the screen has not stopped wanting to print. Six checks in Tests/video.sh, to 55: that the mode is 320 by 200, that a byte is one pixel's colour and only that pixel, that printing leaves a picture alone while the letter still goes out, and that the columns register says nought and then forty again. The example is worth reading for one thing beyond the mode: Fill leaves its destination past what it touched, so two hundred rows are drawn from one address set once. Working out where row n begins would be n times 320, and this machine has no multiply. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01E2JrLzFvuFX9fgi1LDRjrW |
||
|
AnachronautandClaude Opus 5
|
1174bd9af5 |
Give the machine a frame to wait for
V3. The screen interrupts at each frame on hardware vector 0x30, and WAIT finally has something worth sleeping on. THERE WAS NO CLOCK. Every program that wanted to happen at a certain speed counted instructions and hoped, which is why Snake's pause silently halved the day a cycle stopped being an instruction and became a memory access - the program was right and the thing it was counting changed underneath it. A screen finishing sixty times a second is a real beat, and it is counted in the MACHINE'S cycles rather than the host's, so the same program sees the same number of frames in the same number of cycles however fast anything really ran. That is what makes a frame something a test can count and a recorded result can hold. Status bit 0 goes up when a frame has gone by and reading the status port puts it down, so a program with no handler can watch for it instead. Control bit 0 asks to be interrupted, and is OFF when the machine starts: an interrupt with nothing installed to catch it is a fault, so a screen that began interrupting the moment it was switched on would take down every program written before frames existed. More than one frame can pass between two looks, and the flag and the line are each one thing, so several still mean one of each. A missed frame is missed. Programs/Examples/frames.asm prints a dot a frame for a second: 1,000,324 cycles, and 996,460 of them spent asleep. That split is the thing worth seeing - a program that polled instead would print the same sixty dots, take the same second, and spend every cycle of it on the bus. Its header explains why waiting is not spinning and why a machine with a beat can stop guessing at one. Six checks in Tests/video.sh, and two of them are about the clock rather than the output, because the output cannot tell the difference. That the machine slept through nearly all of ten frames, and that polling three frames actually took three frames - a status flag that stayed up once set would print exactly the same character and look perfectly correct. Breaking the frame interrupt on purpose left a machine asleep for ever and hung the whole suite, which is a worse way to be told than a failing check. Tests/video.sh bounds its runs at ten seconds now, the way Tests/run.sh always has. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01E2JrLzFvuFX9fgi1LDRjrW |
||
|
AnachronautandClaude Opus 5
|
d6feddd1b6 |
Give the console colour and a cursor
COLOUR COSTS A NIBBLE AND NO HARDWARE. A glyph is drawn in palette indices 0 and 1, paper and ink, and a cell's attribute nibble adds sixteen to both - so sixteen banks is already sixteen ink and paper pairs, and all that was missing was a register saying which one the console draws in. That is port 0x06, read as well as written like the rest. The palette a machine wakes up with is arranged so that HIGHLIGHTING IS ONE BIT: banks 0 to 7 are colours on black, banks 8 to 15 are the same colours as paper with black ink. So attribute XOR 8 turns any pair inside out. That is a convention rather than a rule of the machine - the device only ever adds the nibble and looks the answer up - but it is the convention that makes a highlighted line and a cursor free. Bank 0 is still grey on black, so nothing that was written before this has changed colour. THE CURSOR IS THE SAME BIT AGAIN. It is drawn by turning its cell inside out rather than by putting a block over it, so the character underneath stays readable, which matters to somebody editing a line. The device draws it rather than the window, because on a machine with a screen a cursor is a hardware feature - one drawn by the presenter would not be in a picture the machine saved. It blinks on the machine's own clock, half a second each way, so the phase is a pure function of the cycle count and a screen saved at a given cycle is the same screen every time. A blink on the host's clock would have made every saved picture a matter of luck. Off unless asked for, with bit 2 of the control port. That is right for a machine - a program painting its own screen does not want something blinking in the middle of it - and CosmOS asks for one at boot. It also asks again when it takes the console back from a program that has stopped, because a program handing key mode back the way it was told to writes zero, which turns the cursor off. The shell owns the prompt, so the shell is what makes sure there is something blinking at it. Nine more checks in Tests/video.sh, to 41: that the attribute colours the ink and not the paper, that XOR 8 turns both, that it reads back, that a cursor appears where the registers put it and only when asked for, and that it goes dark again half a million cycles later. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01E2JrLzFvuFX9fgi1LDRjrW |
||
|
AnachronautandClaude Opus 5
|
6f8ad42277 |
Fill the window, let it be resized, and make black black
Three things a person looking at a real screen found in five minutes, none of which the headless tests could have seen. THE PICTURE FILLED A QUARTER OF THE WINDOW. The window opened at the largest screen the device can make, doubled, and then drew a 320 by 200 mode at that same doubling - so three quarters of it was bezel. It now takes the largest whole-number scale that fits: the two modes are exactly a factor of two apart and the window opens at twice the larger, so both fill it exactly, at four and at two. Changing mode changes how sharp the screen is rather than how big it is. Whole numbers on purpose. A 320 by 200 picture stretched by 2.7 has some rows twice as tall as their neighbours, which on eight pixel glyphs is the difference between text and mush. THE WINDOW WOULD NOT RESIZE. It does now, and the picture rescales to whatever it becomes, still in whole pixels and still centred. How big somebody wants a screen is not the machine's business. AND BLACK WAS NOT BLACK. Both the paper and the bezel were tinted towards green, on the theory that a phosphor never was neutral. On a real screen that reads as a fault rather than as character: a background that is nearly black looks like a background that failed to be black. Paper is black now and ink is a neutral grey, because a default should be the unsurprising thing - anything with a point of view about colour is 254 palette entries away and belongs to a program. The bezel is a clearly lighter grey, so what is left over when the window's shape does not match the picture's looks like a bezel rather than like more screen. The two checks that name the waking colours name the new ones. That they had to change is the check working: they say what they depend on rather than assuming it. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01E2JrLzFvuFX9fgi1LDRjrW |
||
|
AnachronautandClaude Opus 5
|
773b0f8add |
Put CosmOS on the screen without changing a line of it
The console is now a display controller as well as a port: it owns a font, keeps a cursor, handles newline, carriage return, backspace and wrapping, and scrolls. That is an ordinary kind of chip - it is what a video terminal's character generator did - and it is the reason this rung needed no changes to CosmOS at all. CosmOS already writes bytes to port 0x00. It writes to BOTH the screen and standard output, which is deliberate. A machine with a screen and a serial line is an ordinary machine, the emulator's standard output is that serial line, and one console drives both. It is also what keeps all 165 recorded results passing under Voyager, and what makes --screen work on the plain SplitBit: there is one console and it drives everything it has. Scrolling moves the video device's origin and no memory. The row arriving at the bottom is cleared because the map is a ring and it holds what was there 128 rows ago; the rows going off the top are not, and that is a hundred rows of scrollback nothing had to keep. The test reads the register back rather than looking at the screen, because a console blitting rows instead would look identical and cost twelve percent of a frame for every line printed. The font is vendored from Hatchet-GPU with a note saying where it came from, since that repository is not part of this one. 135 glyphs in ASCII order, which is the thing that makes it worth keeping - PETSCII's whole inconvenience was that its order was not ASCII's, so a machine using it needed a translation table in front of every string. Here the machine subtracts 32. It is stored one bit a pixel and expanded into tile memory at reset: 1,088 bytes against 16 kilobytes. Voyager gets a keyboard. A window has no standard input, and a machine blocking on it inside a frame would stop drawing and stop answering, so a front end with a window installs a hook that the console calls while it has nothing: it keeps the window alive and hands back a key. The hook has to tell "nobody has typed yet", which happens sixty times a second, apart from "the window has gone", which is the end of input - one value for both would have made the first keystroke look like a closed machine. In line mode the console echoes what it is given, because there is no terminal behind a window to do it and that was always the terminal's job. Tests/video.sh grew from 14 checks to 26, half of them about the console rather than the device: those programs ask the video device for nothing and write bytes to port 0x00 like every SplitBit program always has. Verified by breaking two things - removing the scroll failed exactly the two checks about scrolling, and removing the cursor advance failed exactly the three that depend on it. Two video checks had quietly depended on palette entry 0 being black, which stopped being true the moment a machine woke up able to show text. They now set what they are about to look at, and a new check pins the waking state itself. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01E2JrLzFvuFX9fgi1LDRjrW |
||
|
AnachronautandClaude Opus 5
|
83623a3df3 |
Give the Voyager a screen
A tile engine on ports 0x30 to 0x3F, bringing one bank of video memory registered the way the disk's buffer is. The CPU writes cell indices and the device turns them into pixels, which is the whole reason a screen is affordable at a megahertz: a frame is 16,667 cycles, a full 320 by 200 picture is 64,000 bytes, and a 40 by 25 map is 2,000. A program that changes two cells writes four bytes. The cost of a screen becomes the number of cells that changed rather than the number of pixels on it. Which makes colour depth free, so the tiles are eight bits: an 8 by 8 cell is 64 pixels and each picks independently out of 256 colours, with no per-cell limit of the kind that made a Spectrum two and C64 multicolour four. The low nibble of a cell's attribute is ADDED to every index in its tile, sixteen at a time, so a tile drawn in 0 to 15 appears in any of sixteen schemes without a second copy in tile memory - and a tile wanting all 256 leaves the nibble at zero and gets them. Neither use costs the other anything. Two decisions are arithmetic rather than taste, and both come from the machine having no multiply. A map row is a page whether the mode fills it or not, so a cell address is the row number as the high byte and the doubled column as the low byte with no arithmetic at all; otherwise every cursor move on a 40 column screen would cost a row-times-40 in software. And a palette entry is four bytes rather than three, so entry n is at n times four, a shift. THE MAP IS A RING and the Scroll register says which of its 128 rows is on top. Scrolling moves a register and no memory: blitting a 40 by 25 screen up one line is 1,920 bytes inside one bank, which is twelve percent of a frame even with the controller widened, and a program printing one page would spend six frames shuffling memory. It is now one port write - and the rows that scrolled off are still there, which is where a terminal gets scrollback it never had. The device is part of the machine rather than part of the window. It renders into a buffer that is a pure function of video memory, so the same program draws the same picture with nobody watching; Voyager puts that buffer on the glass and decides nothing. Both binaries take --screen, which saves a PPM when the machine stops, and that is what makes a screen checkable on a host with no display at all. Tests/video.sh checks fourteen named behaviours rather than comparing a recorded image, because a recorded image would say "something changed" and leave which of the palette, the tile, the attribute, the map or the scroll register broke to be found by hand. Verified by breaking three things in turn: the additive nibble failed exactly one check, the scroll origin exactly two, and moving every cell one pixel sideways exactly the four about placement. Tests/docs.sh could not count past nine, which is how a suite of ten scripts reported itself as wrong for the wrong reason. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01E2JrLzFvuFX9fgi1LDRjrW |