Commit Graph
3 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
AnachronautandClaude Opus 5 3b800a69e8 Monitor: a line assembler
a <address>, then instructions until a line that is just a dot.

The syntax is the assembler's own: a selector rides on the mnemonic as LDA.0
or LDD.0.1, and leaving one off means Data Pointer 0 exactly as it does in a
source file, so nothing learned at the monitor has to be unlearned when
writing a program. Case is folded, since the assembler does not care either.

Numbers are hexadecimal and bare. A source file writes 0x2000 or 0d16 because
it has both and must say which; a monitor has one and says so once, in the
manual, rather than on every line.

It reads the same table the disassembler does, searched the other way round,
which is the point of it being a table rather than two lists: what a writes,
d reads back, and neither can drift from the other or from the assembler both
were generated from. Instruction lengths come from the shared shape table
too, so the cursor cannot get out of step with what was written.

THE WHOLE LINE IS UNDERSTOOD BEFORE ANYTHING IS WRITTEN. Emitting the opcode
first and discovering a missing operand afterwards leaves half an instruction
in memory, which the next line usually covers up and the last line of a
session does not. Written that way first and fixed.

What cannot be written is a label, and that is the whole difference between
this and the assembler proper: a label is a promise to fill an address in
later, and later is what a line at a time does not have.

The recorded test now types in a complete program - a string poked into Data
Memory, instructions assembled into Program Memory, and the result run - and
includes a lower case mnemonic, both selector forms, an instruction that does
not exist and one missing its value, so the refusals sit beside the successes.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-19 22:29:50 -04:00
AnachronautandClaude Opus 5 c23adb2836 Break: name the status register properly and show the Stack Pointer
The dump labelled the status register "S", which reads as Stack to anybody
sensible - and the Stack Pointer was the one register it did not show, so
there was nothing to contradict the guess. It is written "status" now, and
followed by the bits that are up, because a dump that makes you look the
number up is only half a dump.

The Stack Pointer is not in the frame, since the frame is where the Stack
Pointer is. What the program had is fourteen bytes above it, that being what
entering an interrupt puts down, so it is worked out and shown.

Apps/Break.asm takes its second stop inside a subroutine, so the recorded
output shows the Stack Pointer at FFFF and then at FFF5: a difference of ten,
which is the size of a CALL frame. That checks the value is derived rather
than constant, which the previous version could not have told you.

Reported by Anachronaut, who read the output and asked why a pointer was two
digits long.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-19 22:19:15 -04:00
AnachronautandClaude Opus 5 5fd995aa62 Breakpoints: SWI osBreak, and s refuses a read only bank
A breakpoint that shows every register as the program had them, waits for a
key, and carries on.

NOTHING IS OVERWRITTEN, and that is the design rather than a shortcut. A
breakpoint poked into a running program has to replace an instruction, and
putting that instruction back in order to continue is the same act as
disarming the breakpoint; firing a second time would mean stepping over the
restored instruction and putting the breakpoint back behind it, and this
machine cannot step a single instruction. SWI is two bytes, dispatches
through a vector, and its frame already holds the address after it, so RETI
resumes at the next instruction with nothing to restore and nothing to
re-arm. It fires every time it is reached.

The price is that a breakpoint is part of the program: a build with them in
has different addresses from a build without. That is the bargain every
machine with a break instruction makes.

Every value shown comes out of the frame rather than the registers, because
by the time the handler runs the registers are the handler's. Apps/Break.asm
stops twice so that the second stop is checked as well as the first.

Also here, found by the test that came with it: the monitor's s wrote into
whichever bank was selected, and bank 2 is the controller's own table,
published read only. Writing to it was refused, and a refusal nobody catches
stops the machine - so selecting the bank table to look at it and then typing
s killed the session. bankPresent now keeps the whole flags byte and s
declines. The recorded output of cosmosMonitor had contained that crash,
having been blessed without being read.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-19 22:09:21 -04:00