87467a7d3a241132306647362440ce96a32aab62
5
Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
  AnachronautandClaude Opus 5
|
3449405b18 |
Give the system another page of each memory
CosmOS had 1,161 bytes of Program Memory left before the address applications load at, and Tab completion is not going to fit in that with anything to spare. So the wall moves up one page: the system keeps below 0x4FFF and 0x2FFF, and an application is based at 0x5000 and 0x3000. A PAGE IS A CHEAP THING TO GIVE IT AND AN EXPENSIVE THING TO RUN OUT OF. An application still has 44K of Program Memory before the vector table and the largest one here uses 7.5K, so what was taken from applications is space nothing has ever asked for - while what the system gained is the difference between building the next thing and counting bytes while building it. Not doubling, which was the version that would have cost application space worth minding. One page, and the same again when it is needed. Nothing in the machine knows where the wall is, so this is 34 #Base lines, one threshold in the fault handler, and the table in the CosmOS README that Tests/docs.sh reads its limits out of. The native assembler's scratch map had to move with it, and docs.sh said so before anything ran: its data reached 0x40D6 and its buffers began at 0x4000, so they were sitting on its variables. That file already carries a paragraph about the floor coming up and the map staying where it was. It has happened twice now, and been caught by a check the first time wrote. Twenty three recordings are the same runs a page higher. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01E2JrLzFvuFX9fgi1LDRjrW |
||
|
Anachronaut
|
87d819847e |
A program can say how it went
SWI osExit takes a status in A, and the shell keeps it. Fifty eight exits across twenty three programs now say deliberately whether they worked: 25 did what they were asked, 24 did not, 9 were asked wrongly. Compare is the exception and says so - one there means the files differ, which is a result rather than a failure, the way diff has always had it. IN A RATHER THAN Q, which is not a departure from the rule that a service answers in Q. This one takes an ARGUMENT, the way osPrintNumber takes A and B, and it never returns to answer anything. A is free precisely because a return would have put it back - and Q is the ALU's output, so a small number costs four instructions there against one in A. The shell does not print it. A program that failed has already said so in words and a number beside that is noise, so osLastStatus hands it back and Status is the program that shows it. That indirection is the point: the number exists for the thing that cannot read words. MARKING THE EXITS FOUND A DEFECT ON THE FIRST RUN. Type and More printed why they had failed and then fell through into the success exit, reporting that all was well. Nobody had noticed, because while the only reader was a person, the person could see both the complaint and the claim. Two smaller things. Snake sets the console to line mode and then exits with zero, and the linter flagged the second RSTA as redundant - an exit status and a console mode, equal by accident, which is the class that must never be collapsed. And the README still taught answering by writing into the frame, three months of habit that SRET replaced yesterday; that section is gone and the one describing SRET stands in its place. |
||
|
Anachronaut
|
9c144469b4 |
Take the SplitLint findings that are one operation, leave the rest
Twenty four more sites, and the interesting part is which ones were left alone. A rule emerged while reading them and it held all the way through: apply where the repetition is INSIDE one operation, skip where the author's own structure says it is a new thought, and never where two equal values mean different things. Taken: - Five registers reassigned to a value they already held, where both are the same quantity: two masks in one expression in Snake, two spaces printed by the monitor, both halves of block zero in waitTest, and a RSTA in Pour that the very next instruction overwrote. - Eighteen SETDs that reload a pointer inside one operation - a store back into the variable just read, or an INCD stepping to the second byte of a two byte value. Those read correctly without the reload. - sbfsNext, which branched to the label on the line below it. Left, with reasons that are the useful part of this: - Eight registers where the same number means two different things. CosmOS and the loader set A to 1 for a blit command and then to 1 again for a bank number; Asm compares a type against 3 and then a status against 3. Removing those couples one quantity to another that is equal by accident and would part company silently. - Ten RSTAs that open the RSTA/RSTB/CCF/ADD "return zero" block. The redundancy is what makes that idiom self contained; taking it out makes the return value depend on the line above. - Eleven SETDs that begin an arm of a comparison chain. Each arm loads, compares and branches, and they get reordered - the repetition is the reason a new arm can be dropped in anywhere. - Twenty five SETDs separated from their pointer by a blank line or a comment, which is the author saying a new thought starts here. - Two CCFs before arithmetic, which this codebase writes unconditionally. - Three redundant branches in test programs whose recorded output includes addresses, where three fewer bytes moves what the test demonstrates. Nine recorded outputs moved and every one is a size in a listing or, for Life, five more generations inside the same cycle budget. Behaviour is unchanged everywhere: cosmosSnake and cosmosEdit pass byte for byte while Snake loses eight bytes and Edit twelve. CosmOS is 10,902 bytes of program against 10,937, and the native assembler 12,173 against 12,183. The CosmOS README's size for Edit moved twice in one sitting, and this morning's check caught it both times - which it could not have done before that claim was reworded to name what it was about. |
||
|
AnachronautandClaude Opus 5
|
fb7b224bbb |
S2: the assembler writes the file as it makes it
The output image is gone. It was eighteen kilobytes and it is now one block of window, because the file was always produced in order and only ever needed to be written that way. Everything works in FILE OFFSETS now. A cursor is a two byte number counting from the front of the file, and since a block is two hundred and fifty six bytes, the block it lands in is the offset's high byte and the place within that block is its low one - so there is no division anywhere, and ImgWalk, ProgPut and DataPut needed no change but where they start. ONE WINDOW RATHER THAN THREE. The plan said three: one per segment, and a third for the block where the program ends and the data begins, which belongs to both. Fetching a block back instead makes all of that one case. The header is patched after every byte is out, the boundary block is written by both cursors, and both are simply revisits - a revisit is what fetching handles. osFileFetch is the service that allows it, and is the read side of the write. A run of bytes in one segment costs nothing extra; a switch between segments costs two block operations, and a source file has a few dozen switches and several thousand bytes. Two bugs, both a pointer meaning two things: putAt took the cursor to advance in DP2 and then wanted DP2 for the window's address. A call puts DP2 back the way it was AT THE CALL, so the step at the end moved whatever the last call had left there - the window walked off across memory while the cursor stood still. It goes in memory now, like the block did in S1, and for the same reason. The size the file is created at could not be right. How many vectors are actually installed is not known until the second pass has resolved their handlers, and by then the file must already exist to be written into - so Keys, which brings one vector, came out four bytes short. Teaching the first pass to count them meant teaching it about devices, and about a Boot line in a loadable program not being installed at all, which is two ways to disagree with the second pass about what a file contains. So osFileDone is told the size instead. A writer asks for as much as the file could possibly come to - the whole of it plus four bytes for every vector DECLARED, which no file can exceed - and says what it really came to at the end. The blocks it did not use go back to the free count. Asking for too much costs a moment; asking for too little writes off the end of a file. That is a better service for it, not a workaround. A writer that cannot know its size until the last byte is the ordinary case, and it is exactly the case this whole rung exists for. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01E2JrLzFvuFX9fgi1LDRjrW |
||
|
AnachronautandClaude Opus 5
|
9f7dffdeca |
S1: the write side learns to stream
osFileStart, osFileWrite and osFileDone are the mirror of osFileInfo and osFileBlock. A program can now write a file it never holds: Pour writes twelve blocks and a tail while keeping 256 bytes of it at a time, and the host tool reads all 3,112 bytes back with every block where it was put. ONE WRITE IS OPEN AT A TIME AND COSMOS HOLDS IT. Reading needs no state - a name and an index are the whole question - but writing safely does, because the new file has to exist before the old one is thrown away and something has to remember which temporary belongs to which name. Keeping that here means the careful order is written once instead of in every program that streams. Nothing already on the disk is touched until osFileDone, so a disk without room says so while the old file is still there. That is stronger than osFileSave can manage, where the size is only known once the caller has every byte in hand. osFileSave stays: Edit and Files hand over whole documents and have no reason to learn any of this. osFileWrite refuses an index past the end of the file, and that refusal is not politeness. Files are contiguous, so block nine of a three block file is a real block belonging to something else, and writing it would put one file's bytes inside another with nothing anywhere saying so. Checked both ways: the tail block is allowed and the one past it is not. Three bugs, all of them the same shape - a register or pointer used for two things at once: DP3 carried the block count in and was popped high byte first, which is the wrong way round from every reader in the system and made the count two hundred and fifty six times too big. sbfsStreamStart took the name in DP0 and then wanted DP0 for something else before it had read it, so it walked whatever it last pointed at and reported that it could find no room. sbfsStreamWrite kept the caller's block in DP3 across a find - DP3 being the pointer a return does not put back, which is exactly why the find uses it too. What went to the disk was whatever the scan last looked at. It goes in memory now, and the file is correct because every block says which block it is; a check on the length alone would have passed all three of these. Writing no longer finds the file for each block either. Nothing moves a file once it is made, so where it starts is settled when the temporary is created. That was not even slow - a scan stops the moment it matches - but it was a walk of the directory per block for an answer that cannot change, and it is 28 per cent of the cost of writing forty blocks. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01E2JrLzFvuFX9fgi1LDRjrW |