Commit Graph
6 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
Anachronaut 87d819847e A program can say how it went
SWI osExit takes a status in A, and the shell keeps it. Fifty eight exits
across twenty three programs now say deliberately whether they worked: 25
did what they were asked, 24 did not, 9 were asked wrongly. Compare is the
exception and says so - one there means the files differ, which is a result
rather than a failure, the way diff has always had it.

IN A RATHER THAN Q, which is not a departure from the rule that a service
answers in Q. This one takes an ARGUMENT, the way osPrintNumber takes A and
B, and it never returns to answer anything. A is free precisely because a
return would have put it back - and Q is the ALU's output, so a small
number costs four instructions there against one in A.

The shell does not print it. A program that failed has already said so in
words and a number beside that is noise, so osLastStatus hands it back and
Status is the program that shows it. That indirection is the point: the
number exists for the thing that cannot read words.

MARKING THE EXITS FOUND A DEFECT ON THE FIRST RUN. Type and More printed
why they had failed and then fell through into the success exit, reporting
that all was well. Nobody had noticed, because while the only reader was a
person, the person could see both the complaint and the claim.

Two smaller things. Snake sets the console to line mode and then exits with
zero, and the linter flagged the second RSTA as redundant - an exit status
and a console mode, equal by accident, which is the class that must never
be collapsed. And the README still taught answering by writing into the
frame, three months of habit that SRET replaced yesterday; that section is
gone and the one describing SRET stands in its place.
2026-08-27 19:16:21 -04:00
Anachronaut 546f336823 Configuration files, and boot.cfg as the first of them
One setting to a line: a key, a space, the rest of the line is the value.
A semicolon starts a comment. The format was noticed rather than designed -
textSplit already cuts the first word off a line and leaves the rest, and
textSame already insists two strings end together, so reading a setting is
those two routines and a loop. It is also what the shell reads, which makes
a configuration line a command line the machine reads instead of a person
typing one.

The format was chosen by asking what the BOOT LOADER could manage, because
it is the worst case in every direction: a few kilobytes, no operating
system to report to, and if it fails the machine does not start. Two
formats would be worse than one and the loader cannot have the richer one.

CONFIGURATION IS ADVICE. A missing file, a missing key, an unusable value,
a line too long to read: all of them mean use the default and none is a
failure. BUT QUIET IS NOT SILENT - a setting somebody meant, which did not
take effect, says so. That was the user's addition and it is the better
rule: the default alone leaves the only symptom being that the machine did
not do what somebody asked.

So two routines. cfgGet reads and says nothing, because reading three
settings should not report one bad line three times. cfgCheck reads the
file once and reports, and is handed the caller's list of keys - whether a
key means anything is the only part of this a shared reader cannot judge.

/System/Boot/ holds the boot files, and stage two reads boot.cfg for what
to start, with a fallback to try if it does not work and a name compiled in
for when the file says nothing.

THE TEST FOUND A REAL BUG, and it is the interaction I would not have
thought to look for. First-match-wins met an empty value: a file with

  system
  system /System/Boot/bare.bin

matched the first line, handed back nothing, and the machine tried to start
a file with no name while a good setting sat underneath. An unusable value
is an absent one - which is what "configuration is advice" says, and this
is where it earns its keep.

cfgBare starts an image with no operating system in it at all, which is
what loading an ordinary boot image buys: a program wanting the whole
machine is a file like any other, chosen the same way the system is. Three
disks differing ONLY in boot.cfg, so each is a test of the file rather than
of the machinery under it.
2026-08-27 16:04:21 -04:00
Anachronaut c312853f8e The machine starts itself
stage two
  CosmOS
  > saved it
  read it back, 22 bytes:

Stage one hands over to stage two out of a boot slot; stage two mounts the
filesystem, finds /System/cosmos.bin, takes the image apart and places its
code, its data and its vector table, and jumps to the entry point the
vectors named. Nothing placed memory for it.

What it loads is an ORDINARY BOOT IMAGE, the same SPBT file the emulator
has always been handed. That was the user's call and it is the whole trick:
a second stage that loads the machine's normal image format is not a
boot-specific mechanism, so bare metal SplitBit stops being a special case.
A program wanting no operating system under it is just an image, written
under CosmOS like any other, and startable because it is a file.

Three things in it worth knowing:

- THE ENTRY POINT IS CAUGHT ON ITS WAY PAST. Program Memory cannot be read
  back, so the boot vector cannot be looked up after being installed; the
  vector loop notices the one addressed at 0xFC00 and keeps it.
- A missing "VEC" is not a fault. An image written before vectors existed
  simply ends after its data, and then the entry point is zero, which is
  what every such image has always relied on.
- Feature flags that are set mean an image asking for a machine this may
  not be, and the honest answer to a request that cannot be understood is
  to refuse rather than to run it anyway.

The test records that the system WORKS afterwards rather than that it
started. A loaded program running is what says the vector table arrived,
because a program reaches the system through SWI and nothing else; the file
written and the directory entered say the filesystem and the console came
up with it. A second disk has a boot slot and nothing to start, and says so
rather than jumping somewhere.
2026-08-27 14:13:23 -04:00
Anachronaut 82adeeb193 A boot payload can arrange its own Data Segment
Stage one places Program Memory and nothing else, because knowing where a
payload's data ends and its code begins would mean knowing a format, and
knowing formats is what ROM must do as little of as possible. But the real
second stage needs a Data Segment: sbfs.asm has variables and a string it
compares against.

The answer needs nothing new. A loadable image is written into the slot as
code followed by data, so the data image is already in Program Memory just
past the code - and the payload's first instructions blit it down to where
it was assembled for. Proved by slotData.asm, which prints from a string it
placed itself.

The padding is the part worth recording. The blit needs a length and the
assembler will not work out the difference between two labels, so the
segment is padded to a round number and that number is what gets copied.
The first draft padded to 257 and copied 256, and the byte that did not
arrive was padding, so it worked by luck. It is exact now and says why.

This is the shape the user asked for and it goes further than the
mechanism: the second stage becomes a loader for the machine's ORDINARY
image format rather than for anything boot-specific, so bare metal SplitBit
stops being a special case. A program that wants no operating system is
just an image, developed under CosmOS like any other, and selectable at
boot because it is a file.
2026-08-27 13:45:11 -04:00
Anachronaut d07b23f90b Rung 2: the machine starts itself off a disk
Stage one exists and works. It is 330 bytes of program and everything it
knows is a thing that will be true forever: which port the disk is on, that
a SplitBit disk begins with its own name, and where two numbers sit in that
first block. Not what a file is, not what a directory is, not that SBFS has
versions. It reads the live boot slot into Program Memory, jumps to the
first byte, and prints one character and halts if there is nothing there.

It is an ordinary boot image for now, so the whole chain runs on machinery
that already exists and the emulator has not been touched. Nothing about it
changes when it moves into ROM except who puts it in memory.

SplitDisk gained "boot" to write a slot and "bootslot" to choose one, kept
apart on purpose: writing a slot and starting from it are different
decisions, and joining them would make every write a commitment. A slot is
always written WHOLE, because one still holding the tail of what was there
before is one whose contents depend on its history, and stage one reads all
of it without knowing where the file stopped.

Three recorded tests, and the pair is the point: two disks differing only
in which slot the superblock names, with payloads that say different
things. One prints "booted" and the other does not, so this is a test of
CHOOSING a slot rather than a test that some bytes were read. The third
boots a disk with no boot area and gets the one character a ROM has room
for. Eight more host checks, including that a slot is padded whole.

Two things worth recording. The first draft used #Align to put the scratch
buffer at 0x8000 and produced a 33K file - thirty two kilobytes of zeroes
in something meant to be a ROM. It is an address, not storage, which is
exactly what the assembler's own scratch map exists to say.

And SplitLint caught the second in code written an hour after the baseline
that catches it. In the blit set-up, RSTA writes a source address of zero
and then RSTA writes a bank number of zero - two unrelated quantities that
are equal by accident, in the most safety critical file in the repository.
It is marked with a reason rather than removed.
2026-08-26 23:31:04 -04:00
Anachronaut 0a2965bc63 Name the rules, say when there is nothing to say, and hold a baseline
Four things SplitLint wanted, and they build on each other.

EVERY WARNING NAMES ITS RULE, in brackets at the end the way a compiler
names the flag that produced it. Twelve rules, listed by --help. That makes
the other three possible: suppressions can name one rule and leave the line
honest about the others, the harness can assert on a rule's identity rather
than on the wording of its message, and --machine can print one tab
separated line per warning - file, line, rule, message, help - so nothing
downstream reads prose. This file's own output was parsed with regular
expressions three times in one day before it had a shape to rely on.

A CLEAN RUN SAYS SO:

  No style warnings: 121 files checked against 12 rules.

It used to exit in silence, which does not tell you it found nothing - it
tells you nothing at all, and from outside the two are identical.

A MARKER THAT SILENCES NOTHING IS ITSELF REPORTED, as dead-suppression. An
exception that outlived whatever made it necessary is the thing the
required reason exists to prevent, and naming the wrong rule now gets you
both the warning you meant to silence and a note that your suppression is
doing nothing.

AND THE CORPUS IS HELD TO A BASELINE. Sixty one warnings are left in it
deliberately and nothing stopped a sixty second. Tests/lint-baseline.txt
records how many of each rule each file should produce, so a new one fails
make test while the sixty one stay quiet; confirmed by adding an INIA 0d0
to Say.asm and watching it name the file, the rule and the count. It counts
per file and rule rather than recording line numbers, because line numbers
would churn the whole baseline whenever anything was inserted above a
warning - the same reason cycle counts are stripped from recorded output
here. ./Tests/lint.sh --bless records it again.

One thing to know for next time: the rule name was inserted before the line
number at all twenty one call sites, and the signature was changed to match
rather than the twenty one call sites being fixed. (path, rule, line) reads
no worse than (path, line, rule) and one edit has fewer ways to go wrong
than twenty one.
2026-08-26 21:00:21 -04:00