a8b6b09a59d20de5cd30306b71cd4adcca925f62
59
Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
  AnachronautandClaude Opus 5
|
c28826df77 |
Let a script run a script, four deep
A build script calling a setup script is the first thing anybody tries. What is saved when one script starts another is A POSITION AND NOT A BUFFER: the name, which block comes next, how many are left, and where in the block it had got to. Seventy bytes, and they sit next to each other in the data segment on purpose so that saving them is one copy. The block itself is read again on the way back, which costs one disk read per return and saves 257 bytes a level - the inner script reads its own block into the single buffer there is, so coming back means fetching the outer one's block again and landing on the byte it left. The slot is reached by stepping rather than by multiplying, because this machine has no multiply and the depth is never more than three steps. Four levels. Deep enough for a script calling a script that calls a helper, shallow enough that a script running itself says so rather than filling memory. A line that fails now stops every level and not just the innermost, because a build whose helper failed should not carry on in its caller. The caller's place is saved BEFORE the new file is looked at, and put back on every way out that is not success. Opening writes the name into the live state in order to ask the disk about it, so by the time "there is no such file" is known, the caller's place has already been overwritten - a failed 'do' inside a script would otherwise leave the script that ran it reading from a name it never chose. The test resumes in the outer script's SECOND block, which is the case the whole design turns on and the one an ordinary nesting test would miss. Breaking the re-read, the save, or the limit each fails it. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01E2JrLzFvuFX9fgi1LDRjrW |
||
|
AnachronautandClaude Opus 5
|
a12d61fb80 |
Give the shell an echo, so a script can say what it is doing
Say.sbx has printed words since long before there were scripts, and is the wrong shape for one. It is a program: it has to be found on the disk, loaded and started, it prefixes what it was told with "it says:", and the system prints "finished" after it. Three lines of noise around one line of narration, and a load off the disk to produce them. echo is a command, so it costs a comparison. With nothing after it, a blank line - which is what anybody expects and is worth having to space a long script out. Not called "say", although that is the better word. Built-in commands are tried before the disk and always win, so a built-in say would shadow Say.sbx and quietly change what every existing script and test meant by it. Also puts "do" in the help, which the commit that added it forgot, and splits the help text: the new lines pushed it over the assembler's 255 character limit for one string. That failure was hidden for a few minutes by a 'make' whose errors were going to /dev/null - the build kept the disk it already had, and the machine cheerfully reported "I do not know: echo" from a system assembled before echo existed. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01E2JrLzFvuFX9fgi1LDRjrW |
||
|
AnachronautandClaude Opus 5
|
2466d79d9c |
Let the shell run a file of commands
'do <file>' runs the lines in a file as though they had been typed. The
only thing a script changes is where the next line comes from: everything
below shellReadLine - splitting the line, matching it, loading a program -
cannot tell the difference and does not have to.
What makes a file a script is '#!' on the front of it, not its name and not
a flag in its entry. The rule this filesystem keeps is that an entry holds
only what the content cannot say about itself, and a script can say what it
is; the loader already refuses anything that is not SBEX, so the two kinds
of runnable file turn each other away without either knowing about the
other. It is also the deferred half of the file-typing design, which said
to wait for a second kind of runnable thing before building any of it. This
is that second kind.
'#' is a directive and ';' is a comment, as in SplitBit assembly - one rule
across the machine rather than two dialects. Not Unix's convention: there
'#!' really is a comment that only the kernel reads, while here the shell
requires it and refuses the file without it, so calling it a comment would
be a lie about what it does.
A script stops at the first line that does not work, which is what the
LineFailed groundwork was for. Comments and blank lines are dropped by the
reader rather than by the dispatch, so they are not echoed either. A script
running out hands back to the console rather than ending the shell, because
running out of file and running out of typing are not the same thing. The
interactive assembler reads through the same path, so a script can contain
a block of assembly.
Three things this cost that were not obvious:
- RET puts A and B back, so a routine cannot answer in them. scriptByte
returning the character in A assembled, ran, and handed the caller its
own A back every time. It answers in memory now.
- A last line with no newline is still a line. Text files do not reliably
end with one and an editor eating it is a bad way to find out a command
did not run.
- Not LastStatus. See the commit before this one.
Six checks in three tests, two of which are about byte positions rather
than behaviour - a command lying across the boundary between two blocks,
and that missing newline - so their fixtures are generated rather than
committed, where an editor cannot helpfully repair them.
Nesting is not in yet: a script cannot run a script. That wants a stack of
positions rather than the one the reader keeps.
Also derives native.sh's self-hosting source list from cosmos.asm's own
#Include lines. It was a hand written list and went stale the moment
script.asm existed - the fourth time a list beside a thing has drifted from
the thing - so it now asks the thing.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01E2JrLzFvuFX9fgi1LDRjrW
|
||
|
AnachronautandClaude Opus 5
|
310804e267 |
Give Snake back the speed its comment promised, and present in step with the display
Two things, one certain and one likely. THE CERTAIN ONE IS NOT THE WINDOW'S FAULT. Snake's pause loop said "at the emulated rate this is about an eighth of a second", and it was, when a cycle was one instruction. A cycle became one memory access, every loop in the machine got dearer, and this one silently doubled: the game has been running at half the speed it documents ever since, in a terminal as much as in a window. Measured rather than guessed - the inner loop is a DECA and a BNA, one byte and three, so four cycles a turn, and a whole run went from 3,848,610 cycles to 1,920,504 when the outer count came down from 256 to 122. Almost exactly half, which is what the arithmetic said it would be. That is the cost model change reaching a program nobody thought to re-measure. Worth looking for others: any loop tuned by eye before that change is running at half its intended speed. THE LIKELY ONE is the frame limiter. Without the vsync hint, Raylib sleeps towards sixty frames a second on its own clock, which beats against a display refreshing on its own - frames shown twice or skipped, and the machine handed an uneven number of cycles each time, since it takes its budget from the wall clock. The hint puts presentation in step with the screen. SetTargetFPS stays for a driver that ignores it. Snake is one byte bigger, because RSTB became INIB. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01E2JrLzFvuFX9fgi1LDRjrW |
||
|
AnachronautandClaude Opus 5
|
43a05b3df1 |
Replace the escape parser with cursor registers
The console had grown an ANSI parser, and that was the wrong shape. ANSI exists because a screen used to be on the other end of a serial line and a byte stream was the only channel there was. This screen is memory the program can already address, so reaching it by sending characters for a state machine to take apart is a middleman for something the machine does better - and it meant accepting an open protocol somebody else defines, in hardware, with no natural end to it. Everything else on this machine is registers. So the console gets three: cursor row at 0x03, cursor column at 0x04, and a command port at 0x05 where 1 clears the screen. Both cursor registers are READ as well as written, which is the thing an escape cannot do without sending a query and parsing a reply - a routine that wants to put the cursor back where it found it can now ask. Clearing is one command against a thousand cells walked one at a time. Snake and Life are smaller for it: 2,168 bytes to 2,163 and 1,410 to 1,396. A HOST TERMINAL STILL SPEAKS ANSI, and bridging to the host is the emulator's job, the same job it does reading standard input. So the escapes are now GENERATED, outbound, for the set this device chooses, rather than parsed inbound as though the machine were a terminal. The set cannot grow behind our backs because we are the ones saying it. The cursor is announced lazily, at the next character rather than at the register write, so setting a row and a column costs one sequence rather than two. The console's block widens from three ports to six, which registryTest noticed: it had been asking about port 0x05 precisely BECAUSE nothing was there, and the console had just moved in. Re-blessing it would have left it checking nothing, so it asks about 0x80 instead - clear of the console, the disk, the screen, the controller, and the sound device coming to 0x40. Six checks in Tests/video.sh swapped from the sequences to the registers, including that the cursor reads back and that one sent past the edge is clamped rather than refusing. Those checks also stopped counting bytes from the ends of a file, which had quietly started measuring an escape the moment the console began announcing the cursor. SplitLint caught the one thing worth catching in the port: the clear command leaves A at 1 and key mode is also 1, so the second load looks redundant. Acting on it would tie a console command to a console mode by coincidence, and break silently if either ever moved, so it is suppressed with that reason rather than removed. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01E2JrLzFvuFX9fgi1LDRjrW |
||
|
Anachronaut
|
87d819847e |
A program can say how it went
SWI osExit takes a status in A, and the shell keeps it. Fifty eight exits across twenty three programs now say deliberately whether they worked: 25 did what they were asked, 24 did not, 9 were asked wrongly. Compare is the exception and says so - one there means the files differ, which is a result rather than a failure, the way diff has always had it. IN A RATHER THAN Q, which is not a departure from the rule that a service answers in Q. This one takes an ARGUMENT, the way osPrintNumber takes A and B, and it never returns to answer anything. A is free precisely because a return would have put it back - and Q is the ALU's output, so a small number costs four instructions there against one in A. The shell does not print it. A program that failed has already said so in words and a number beside that is noise, so osLastStatus hands it back and Status is the program that shows it. That indirection is the point: the number exists for the thing that cannot read words. MARKING THE EXITS FOUND A DEFECT ON THE FIRST RUN. Type and More printed why they had failed and then fell through into the success exit, reporting that all was well. Nobody had noticed, because while the only reader was a person, the person could see both the complaint and the claim. Two smaller things. Snake sets the console to line mode and then exits with zero, and the linter flagged the second RSTA as redundant - an exit status and a console mode, equal by accident, which is the class that must never be collapsed. And the README still taught answering by writing into the frame, three months of habit that SRET replaced yesterday; that section is gone and the one describing SRET stands in its place. |
||
|
Anachronaut
|
9c144469b4 |
Take the SplitLint findings that are one operation, leave the rest
Twenty four more sites, and the interesting part is which ones were left alone. A rule emerged while reading them and it held all the way through: apply where the repetition is INSIDE one operation, skip where the author's own structure says it is a new thought, and never where two equal values mean different things. Taken: - Five registers reassigned to a value they already held, where both are the same quantity: two masks in one expression in Snake, two spaces printed by the monitor, both halves of block zero in waitTest, and a RSTA in Pour that the very next instruction overwrote. - Eighteen SETDs that reload a pointer inside one operation - a store back into the variable just read, or an INCD stepping to the second byte of a two byte value. Those read correctly without the reload. - sbfsNext, which branched to the label on the line below it. Left, with reasons that are the useful part of this: - Eight registers where the same number means two different things. CosmOS and the loader set A to 1 for a blit command and then to 1 again for a bank number; Asm compares a type against 3 and then a status against 3. Removing those couples one quantity to another that is equal by accident and would part company silently. - Ten RSTAs that open the RSTA/RSTB/CCF/ADD "return zero" block. The redundancy is what makes that idiom self contained; taking it out makes the return value depend on the line above. - Eleven SETDs that begin an arm of a comparison chain. Each arm loads, compares and branches, and they get reordered - the repetition is the reason a new arm can be dropped in anywhere. - Twenty five SETDs separated from their pointer by a blank line or a comment, which is the author saying a new thought starts here. - Two CCFs before arithmetic, which this codebase writes unconditionally. - Three redundant branches in test programs whose recorded output includes addresses, where three fewer bytes moves what the test demonstrates. Nine recorded outputs moved and every one is a size in a listing or, for Life, five more generations inside the same cycle budget. Behaviour is unchanged everywhere: cosmosSnake and cosmosEdit pass byte for byte while Snake loses eight bytes and Edit twelve. CosmOS is 10,902 bytes of program against 10,937, and the native assembler 12,173 against 12,183. The CosmOS README's size for Edit moved twice in one sitting, and this morning's check caught it both times - which it could not have done before that claim was reworded to name what it was about. |
||
|
Anachronaut
|
e1273337c4 |
Two mechanical fixes SplitLint found: MVQA, and RSTA for zero
Twenty four places moved Q into A or B by pushing it and popping it back. That is four bus cycles and two bytes to do what MVQA does in one of each, and several of them are inside loops - Life, the calculator, int8. Nineteen more loaded zero with INIA 0d0 where RSTA says the same thing in one byte. Both are equivalent at the CPU rather than by assertion: RSTA and INIA both leave Status alone, and PSHQ followed by POPA nets to A = Q with the Stack Pointer where it started. The one difference is that the pair leaves a copy of Q in memory just below the Stack Pointer and MVQA does not, which nothing here reads. Five recorded outputs moved and every one of them says the change worked: - 16x16Life fits five more generations into the same cycle budget, the first 457 lines identical, because the loop got cheaper. - Life.sbx is 1409 bytes rather than 1411, in three tests that list it. - Edit.sbx is 1995 rather than 1996. That last one broke a check I added this morning, and the hole is worth recording: the CosmOS README's claim about Edit's size did not have the word "Edit" on the same line as the number, because the subject was in the sentence before, so the check that measures quoted sizes skipped it silently. The sentence now names what it is talking about, which makes it both checkable and clearer, and the check fails on a wrong number there. Comments on either half of a replaced pair are carried onto the instruction that replaces them, so nothing anybody wrote was lost. |
||
|
AnachronautandClaude Opus 5
|
d4cba36c5e |
Devices that take time, and a filesystem that waits for one
The disk's status has always had a bit meaning "still going", and the header beside it has always said to honour it. Nothing did, because nothing could: the host finished the transfer inside the instruction that asked for it, so the bit could never be seen up and asking about it was asking about something that cannot happen. --disk-cycles gives it a latency. The command is still checked at once, because a refusal is not work - a block that is not there fails before any head moves - but the transfer is remembered and done when the machine has run that far. Until then the buffer holds the block BEFORE this one. That last part is the point. A program that does not wait gets the wrong bytes rather than an error, which is the failure the bit exists to prevent and the one that would never have shown up. With a latency of two thousand, CosmOS could not even mount: sbfsMount reads block zero and looks straight at the buffer. deviceTick is the general shape rather than a disk feature. Called once per instruction with the machine's clock, it lets anything whose moment has come finish - which is what a display that refreshes, or a port that waits on the host, would want in exactly the same way. The filesystem watches the bit now, in one small routine reached with RCAL. That is not decoration: what it hands back is the settled status in A, and CALL puts A back the way it found it, so an ordinary call cannot carry the one thing this exists to carry. Two bytes of Stack rather than ten, in a routine that runs on every block the machine ever touches - the first place in the system where the new call is the right one rather than merely a cheaper one. The manifest takes a @N after a disk, the way it already takes :ro, so a test can ask for a slow one. cosmosSlowDisk lists a directory at two thousand cycles a block and gets the same listing as everything else, which is the whole assertion: a filesystem that did not wait would print nonsense rather than fail. Zero is the default and every other test runs at it. What waiting costs, on a directory heavy run: 229k cycles at zero, 275k at five hundred, 415k at two thousand, 1.16M at ten thousand. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01E2JrLzFvuFX9fgi1LDRjrW |