The six settled back on the twenty fourth, built now.
RCAL and RRET are a call that puts nothing back. CALL restores A, B and Data
Pointers 0 through 2, which costs ten bytes of Stack and is why a subroutine
here can only hand anything back through Q, DP3 or memory. RCAL costs two and
restores nothing, which is what a short leaf routine wants and is unsafe in
exactly the way the name says.
They are a pair because the frames are different sizes: returning from one
through the other walks the Stack to somewhere that was never a return address.
That was the user's correction to the original proposal, which had a raw call
and no raw return.
DPUA and DPDA offset a Data Pointer by A; DPUW and DPDW by A and B together,
most significant first. DPUP and DPDN take a byte written into the program, so
moving a pointer by something just worked out meant storing it and loading it
back. Down as well as up on symmetry grounds, which was also the user's call -
the argument against it came from counting uses in a corpus written under the
constraint.
The opcodes sit where they belong: 0x16 and 0x1E immediately below CALL and RET,
and 0x4E through 0x51 at the end of the Data Pointer family. All six fit shapes
that already existed, so instructiontable.py needed only set membership and both
machine side copies of the table regenerated from it unchanged.
Checked at every level it exists at: the emulator runs them, the host assembler
encodes them, the monitor disassembles all six with the right lengths, and the
assembler that runs on the machine builds a program using them byte for byte
identically to the host - and that program runs.
The recorded test measures what the two calls COST as well as what they put
back, because an RCAL that quietly did what CALL does would still return to the
right place. It does not survive that: returned through RRET, it hangs.
docs.sh can read a two word number now. The count of instructions taking a Data
Pointer went past twenty, and the pattern only allowed one word, so the check
would have reported that the manual had stopped saying it rather than that the
number was wrong.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01E2JrLzFvuFX9fgi1LDRjrW
It always wrote .bin, whatever it had built. So assembling a loadable
program without -o produced Say.bin containing SBEX - a boot image name on a
file the machine cannot boot, in a repository whose whole convention is that
a .bin is started from and a .sbx is loaded.
Successfully wrote SplitBit boot image to "hello.bin".
Successfully wrote SplitBit loadable program to "Say.sbx".
programIsLoadable() already existed and is already what decides which
writer runs; the name now asks it too. Nothing in the build depended on the
old behaviour, because everything that assembles anything passes -o.
THE ASSEMBLER THAT RUNS ON SPLITBIT ALREADY DID IT THIS WAY. Two assemblers
naming their output differently from the same source is exactly the kind of
difference that wastes an afternoon, and the newer one was right.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01E2JrLzFvuFX9fgi1LDRjrW
"Binary" was doing three jobs. It meant an SPBT file that the machine starts
from; it meant whatever the assembler happened to produce, which is now
either that or a loadable program; and it meant a compiled host tool. A word
that means three things means none of them, and the first of the three has a
name already - this project has been calling them boot images for a while
and the manuals had not caught up.
Where it means an SPBT file -> boot image
Where it means either output -> output
Where it means a host executable -> left alone
Where it means base two -> left alone
The user facing messages move with it:
Error: No boot image specified.
Usage: ./SplitBit [OPTIONS] <boot image>
Error: This is not a SplitBit boot image.
Error: This boot image is in format version 2, and this emulator reads 1.
Successfully wrote SplitBit boot image to "hello.bin".
The assembler's own help was the interesting case. Its -o writes either
format, so "the binary" there was never right - it is "the output" now, and
the message that names the format is the one that says which it wrote.
No recorded output contained the word, so nothing needed re-blessing.
Checked before starting rather than after.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01E2JrLzFvuFX9fgi1LDRjrW
The quotes are gone by the time a token is classified, so checkIfKeyword's
test of token[0] == '#' matched the STRING "#Program" sitting in a program's
Data Segment. It was read as the directive: the segment silently changed in
the middle of the data, the string's nine bytes were charged to the Program
cursor instead of the Data one, and every label defined after it came out
nine bytes wrong - in a file that still had a valid header, a plausible
length, and nothing to say about any of it. The only symptom was a program
that jumped into the middle of an instruction.
This is the FOURTH of the family. A string spelling a mnemonic assembled as
that instruction; a string beginning with a zero was rejected as a malformed
literal; a string in the Program Segment was discarded in silence. The
instruction check and the literal check both carry a "not a STRING" guard
already. This one did not, so it has one now, and it lives inside
checkIfKeyword rather than at the call site so it cannot be left off again.
Nothing had ever triggered it, because nothing had ever needed a directive's
name as data. An assembler written FOR this machine necessarily does: it has
to compare tokens against "#Program" and "#Data". It was found by building
one and watching it fault on its second instruction.
Test stringKeyword puts every directive name in a program's data and prints
a label defined after them. Verified that it bites: without the fix the
assembler refuses the file outright.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01E2JrLzFvuFX9fgi1LDRjrW
A token is classified after its quotes have been stripped, so a string
literal reading "ADD" looked exactly like the ADD instruction and was
assembled as one. It failed with "attempting to assemble outside the
Program Segment", a message about a mistake nobody had made.
The literal and label checks were already guarded against strings and the
instruction check was not. Mnemonics match without regard to case, so
"or" and "and" were caught by this too, and those are ordinary enough
words to want in a message.
Third of its family, after a string beginning with '0' being read as a
malformed number and a string in the Program Segment being silently
discarded. All three have the same root.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The loadable program format's header has been in the working tree since
the loader was written and has never been in the repository: the gitignore
rules matched Source/Assembler as a directory, so it was silently
untracked. Anything cloning this repository could not build it, because
secondPass.c includes this file.
This is the failure the previous commit describes, having already happened
once without being noticed.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Added DPUP and DPDN, which take a one byte operand specifying how far up or down to offset the Data Pointer.
Three Fibonacci generators using the print.asm library.
- 8 bit values printing in decimal representation.
- 16 bit values printing in hexadecimal representation.
- 32 bit values printing in hexadecimal representation.
AnachronautandClaude Opus 5
Anachronaut