bfc46d982e72aa21f6bf0b367872230b624f9875
13
Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
  AnachronautandClaude Opus 5
|
17c8da111f |
A window: a layer that does not scroll
The map moves and this does not, which the map alone cannot express. The scroll registers move ALL of it, so a score printed into the map slides away, and one printed into whichever rows the view happens to be showing jumps a pixel at a time as the fine offset changes. Port 0x3D is how many rows tall and 0x3E is which row it starts at. Nought tall is no window, so a cleared screen has none and every program written before this means what it meant. A start row is a register because a status bar along the bottom is as common as one along the top. IT HAS ITS OWN MEMORY, and that is the argument for it. The cheaper design draws the top rows of the MAP without the scroll applied - no new memory, one register - and makes those rows part of the playfield's ring, so a game that scrolls vertically has to route its world around its own scoreboard for ever. The point of a status bar is that it is not somewhere in the level. Lunar Porter does not scroll vertically today and will the moment an orbit is a thing you can reach. 0xC000 in the screen bank, which the map does not reach: it ends at 0xBFFF. Same cells, same tiles, same pages, same schemes. Being in the screen bank makes it per screen, so flipping the buffer flips the status bar with it - what a double buffered game wants, and surprising the other way round. Drawn over everything, sprites included. A sprite that could cover the fuel gauge would be a bug in every game that had both. Tile modes only. In bitmap mode the picture is using that memory, so a bitmap program pins things to the screen with sprites, which are in screen coordinates for the same reason. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01E2JrLzFvuFX9fgi1LDRjrW |
||
|
AnachronautandClaude Opus 5
|
cb898450b5 |
Sprites that scale, and a depth buffer to hide them behind
A target size in PIXELS rather than a multiplier, which is the whole of why this is usable here. A billboard at distance d wants to be k/d pixels tall, and that is a number a program has anyway - out of a lookup table, most likely. A multiplier would have to be a fixed point fraction arrived at by dividing, and this CPU cannot divide. Zero on an axis means the natural size, so every sprite written before scaling existed still means what it meant. The two axes are independent, and that shape - one tile wide at its own size, stretched to whatever height a distance says - is a wall column in a pseudo-3D game. Measured: a DDA step costs 85 cycles, so 80 columns of ray casting is about 85,000 cycles, or 12fps. Drawing those walls from the CPU instead would be 256,000 writes, fifteen frames of cycles for one frame of screen. The device doing the pixels is what makes such a game possible at all here, not merely faster. And a depth buffer, one byte a screen column at 0xD000, written by the program. A sprite with a depth draws only in the columns it is in front of. PER COLUMN, and that is the point: a billboard is nearer than the wall at one end of itself and further at the other, and no ordering of the table can say that. Table order settles sprites against each other; the buffer settles them against the scenery. Zero means no test at both ends, so a program that never writes it behaves as it did before it existed. The entry grew from 8 bytes to 16 - now, while two programs use the table, rather than once a game is written on it. Bytes 0 to 7 kept their meanings, so Sprite.asm needed no change. The pass is rewritten to walk where a sprite is GOING rather than where it came from, which is what makes a stretch and a squash one operation. It also made flipping fall out: turning the source coordinate round mirrors the tile order and the pixels inside each tile in one step, where drawing tile by tile had to be told to do both. All 111 checks passed unchanged at natural size, which is what says the rewrite changed nothing it should not. Clipping moved out of the inner loop and had to: a target size is sixteen bits, so a sprite asked to be 60,000 pixels tall would have been sixty thousand turns of a loop that drew eight rows. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01E2JrLzFvuFX9fgi1LDRjrW |
||
|
AnachronautandClaude Opus 5
|
9eed23120f |
Four pages of tiles, in bits that were already there
A tile number is a byte and a byte reaches 256, which is not many once a font has taken 135 of them and a game wants a character, a background and a wall. Bits 4 and 5 of the attribute now say which page of 256 the number is in - bits already written on every cell and every sprite, and reserved for this since the attribute was defined. Four pages of 16K is 64K, which is the whole atlas, so THE FOURTH PAGE IS THE MEMORY THE SPRITE TABLE AND THE PALETTE ARE IN. That is not a hole in the design; it is the answer shared video memory has always given, and it is checked rather than forbidden. The atlas is 1024 tiles, and what a program spends on sprites and colours comes out of them: no sprites means page 3 is art, and sprites means 768 tiles and a reason. The page is a property of the CELL and not a mode, so one screen shows tiles from all four at once and nothing has to decide which page it is in. Both places a tile is drawn from now ask one function where the art is. They would otherwise drift: the sprite pass was written days after the map pass and neither is where the other is looked at. Nothing in CosmOS changes. The shell draws from page 0, which the screen save covers; a tile left in another page is invisible unless a map cell names that page, and the map is given back or cleared. Both breaks were tried and both failed the checks - and the second had to be tried twice, because the constant it needed lives in video.h and the harness was only editing video.c. That is the same silent no-op as yesterday's uncompiled break, in a different disguise. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01E2JrLzFvuFX9fgi1LDRjrW |
||
|
AnachronautandClaude Opus 5
|
a916103a7f |
Sprites: things that move without the screen moving
Everything drawn on this machine was in a cell. Something between two cells meant rewriting both; something moving a pixel at a time meant rewriting them sixty times a second, which is affordable for one thing and not for twenty. A sprite is put at a pixel and the device draws it over whatever is behind, so moving it costs two bytes. MADE OF TILES, which is the decision the rest follows from: m by n taken in reading order from one index, so there is no second pixel format, no second kind of memory, and nothing a sprite can show that the map cannot. A 16 by 16 character is four tiles and the background can name the same four. 256 entries of 8 bytes at 0xC000 in the atlas - eight so the entry address is a shift, the same no-multiply argument as the palette's four. Position is signed and sixteen bits, because 640 by 400 does not fit in a byte and a sprite has to be able to sit half off the left rather than appearing whole at the edge. A PIXEL OF ZERO IS NOT DRAWN, or every sprite is a rectangle. Tested before the attribute is added, so a hole belongs to the art and not to the colour scheme. The same rule the other way round is what "behind" means: drawn only where the background pixel was zero, so a thing walks behind a pillar and in front of the floor in one frame. All of them draw, every frame, so they cannot flicker. Real machines dropped them per scanline because they had a fixed number of shift registers; this has a loop. The limit is the size of the table, which is a constant rather than a property of what is on screen. And the system takes them down at exit. The sprite table sits in the gap the screen save walks around - to the end of the map, then the palette - and that is right, because nothing the shell draws is a sprite: there is nothing to give back, only something to take away. Otherwise a program that put a ball up and left would leave it over the prompt, in front of everything, with nothing able to type it away. Sprite.asm deliberately leaves its own, because a program that faulted could not have cleared it. Every check here was re-broken and failed: transparency, reading order, draw order, priority, and size. Size needed breaking twice - the first attempt did not compile, and a silent build failure had left the old binary passing. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01E2JrLzFvuFX9fgi1LDRjrW |
||
|
AnachronautandClaude Opus 5
|
023362b05a |
A second screen, and one port to say which is shown
A screen drawn where it can be seen is seen half drawn. A program that moves forty things and rewrites the map underneath them is wrong for as long as it takes to put them all right, and at a megahertz that is long enough to look at. So the device brings a second screen bank, on port 0x3B, and port 0x3C says which of the two is displayed. Everything a program draws into the other one is invisible until one byte shows the whole of it at once. ONE REGISTER IS ENOUGH, where the hardware this imitates needed two. The other said which screen the CPU's window pointed at; there is no window here, because a program reaches a bank through the memory controller by its number. Writing to the screen that is not shown is a matter of naming its bank, and the device never has to be told. And a flip cannot tear: a frame is drawn from one bank in one go, so a flip either happened before that frame or happens before the next. There is nothing to race, where the real machines had to catch the few lines between frames to swap in. The console draws into whichever screen is displayed rather than one of its own, so a fault message lands where somebody can read it even if a game had flipped. And CosmOS puts the displayed screen back at exit, the way it already puts back the cursor and the ink: a program that faulted while flipped could not have, and a shell that only came out right for programs which remembered would come out wrong the day one crashed. Flip.asm is the worked example. It deliberately does NOT restore the display itself - that is the point of the paragraph above, and it is what makes the system's guarantee the thing under test rather than the program's good manners. Written the other way round first, where it passed with the guarantee deleted. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01E2JrLzFvuFX9fgi1LDRjrW |
||
|
AnachronautandClaude Opus 5
|
66e7b84272 |
The screen is two banks: an atlas and a screen
Tiles and colours are written when a program loads; the map is written whenever anything moves. Sharing one 64K bank made them compete for room neither needed all of, and had a worse consequence than being cramped: a bitmap covers the whole bank, so entering bitmap mode destroyed the font. A program could not draw a picture and then say anything about it. Split, each gets a whole bank. The atlas holds the tiles and the palette, the screen holds the map or a bitmap, and a picture now costs the map and nothing else. It also leaves 48K free in the atlas, which is where the sprite table and a second page of tiles are going. No new mechanism was needed. A bank is registered by naming the port that owns it, so a device with two banks needs two ports that own memory: the base port keeps the atlas, since tiles have been at 0x0000 since there was a screen at all, and 0x3A owns the screen. The registry now answers honestly about which ports in the block bring memory, where it used to say all sixteen did. CosmOS never addresses video memory except in one place - the screen save, which walks 196 pages of it. The page number already says which bank a page is in, so screenBankFor works it out rather than keeping a second list beside screenPageFor. Grid and picture.asm register both banks; colours.asm only touches the palette and needed none of it. Tests/video.sh names the memory every write is for, because an address cannot: tile 5 and bitmap pixel 5 are both 0x0005, and a helper that guessed would be right for the tiles and silently wrong for a picture. And picture.asm gained a check, because this change broke it and nothing noticed - registering the second bank leaves DestBank pointing at it, so the palette went into the wrong one and the picture came out black. It was the only thing here found by looking rather than by a test. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01E2JrLzFvuFX9fgi1LDRjrW |
||
|
AnachronautandClaude Opus 5
|
f97d15de08 |
The font comes from a chip, not from RAM that remembers
videoReset zeroed video memory and then wrote the font and the sixteen colour schemes into it, and the comment above that said out loud what was wrong with it: "everything here is ordinary video memory". RAM does not wake up with anything in it. That was the last piece of magic in this device, and it looked harmless until something wanted the font BACK - a program that redefines a glyph had destroyed the only copy there was. So the device has a character generator, the way the machines this one is pretending to be really did, and the copy into RAM is a thing it DOES rather than a state it mysteriously starts in. Command port 0x39: bit 0 for the font, bit 1 for the schemes. THE RAM IS STILL RAM. A program may overwrite every glyph and every colour and should be able to, which is what makes this a tile engine rather than a text display. What changed is that it is no longer a one way door. NEITHER COMMAND CLEARS WHAT IT DOES NOT OWN. The font used to clear the whole of tile memory before writing itself, which was harmless while it happened only at reset and is wrong the moment a program can ask: a program that defined a tile of its own and then wanted its text back would have paid for it with the tile. The reason it is a chip rather than a file on the disk, which was the other candidate: the boot chain prints before CosmOS exists. Stage one prints "?" when there is nothing to boot, and if the font came off the disk then the message about the disk having failed would be the one thing that could not be drawn. A system that wants its own font still loads one over the top - the ROM is the floor, not the policy. Two things that had been worked around now simply work. The shell asks for both whenever a program exits, so a program that redefined a letter no longer leaves it unable to spell, and Grid no longer needs to have saved the screen to avoid handing back green text on blue. And the fault screen asks for the glyphs first, because a message spelled in somebody's tile graphics is no message at all. Five video checks. Two runs each for the font and the schemes, since the map holds a tile NUMBER and the glyph is looked up when the frame is drawn - so restoring changes every cell using it, including ones drawn before, and what the two runs differ by is the command. The third guards the decision not to clear: tile 200 has to survive the font coming back. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01E2JrLzFvuFX9fgi1LDRjrW |
||
|
AnachronautandClaude Opus 5
|
bcd42e75ca |
Scroll the screen sideways, and by less than a cell
The screen could move one way, a cell at a time. Three registers were missing and this adds them: a column origin so the map can be wider than the screen as well as taller, and a pixel remainder for each axis so the step can be one pixel rather than eight. 0x36 Scroll column, in cells, wrapping at 128 0x37 Fine X, 0 to 7 pixels 0x38 Fine Y, 0 to 7 pixels FINE DOES NOT CARRY INTO COARSE. Writing 8 to a fine register writes 0, because only its low three bits mean anything. The alternative was for a write of 8 to step the coarse register, and it was rejected for one reason: a program that scrolls has to know where it has got to, and if the hardware carries then the only way to find out is to read the register back. Keeping them apart means the program already knows, because it did the arithmetic itself. It is also what the machines this one is pretending to be did. The renderer now draws one more row and one more column than fit and clips them, because with a fine offset the screen no longer begins on a cell boundary and the cells at two edges are partly off it. videoPutCell follows the column origin as it has always followed the row - a caller means a cell of the SCREEN, and the screen is a window onto the map. The fine offsets are deliberately not applied there: they move the finished picture by less than a cell, and there is no such thing as less than a cell to write into. So a program may scroll to any pixel without the console's idea of where row three, column five is moving underneath it. Grid now scrolls diagonally, a pixel a frame, in four port writes and two carries. It moved eight pixels every fourth frame before, which reads as the picture jumping rather than travelling. Seven checks, each one the same program with one register changed, so what is compared is where the picture stopped. Breaking fine X, fine Y, the column origin, the three-bit mask, or the console's use of the origin each fails exactly one of them. Grid's own two checks had to be rewritten, and the reason is worth keeping: they asked whether pixel 4 was a grid line, which was really a check that the scroll happened to be at a cell boundary. A picture that moves a pixel a frame can only be asked things that are true at every offset - that it repeats every eight pixels, and that one band of eight rows holds different colours from the next. Also repairs docs.sh, which found the minimal CosmOS application by taking the first asm block in the README. Documenting a program with an example above it made that a different block, and the check complained that the minimal application had no #Base about something that never claimed to be one. It looks under System Services now. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01E2JrLzFvuFX9fgi1LDRjrW |
||
|
AnachronautandClaude Opus 5
|
13b20c8834 |
Give the screen a bitmap mode
V4. Mode 2 is 320 by 200 with a byte a pixel: no tile to look up and no attribute to add, the byte IS the palette index. Programs/Examples/picture.asm fills a whole one in 127 bytes of program and 47,498 cycles. IT IS THE SAME MEMORY AS THE TILES AND THE MAP, which is what shared video memory has always been, and there is nowhere else it could be - 64,000 bytes of picture in a 65,536 byte bank leaves room for nothing beside it. Going to bitmap mode does not clear the text screen, it stops calling it one, and coming back finds the tiles holding whatever the picture put there. Taking the screen means taking it. The palette moves to 0xFC00, the top of video memory, because it is the one thing that has to mean the same in every mode and 64,000 bytes of picture leaves nowhere in the middle for it to hide. That is a documented address, so the example, the tests and the manual move with it. A BITMAP HAS NO COLUMNS AND NO ROWS, and both registers read zero rather than a leftover from the last mode. The console asks: told there is no character screen, it has nowhere to put a glyph and draws nothing, while still saying everything down the serial line. The honest alternative is what a machine with shared video memory really does, which is scribble marks nobody can read across somebody's picture - honest and useless, since a program that has taken the screen has not stopped wanting to print. Six checks in Tests/video.sh, to 55: that the mode is 320 by 200, that a byte is one pixel's colour and only that pixel, that printing leaves a picture alone while the letter still goes out, and that the columns register says nought and then forty again. The example is worth reading for one thing beyond the mode: Fill leaves its destination past what it touched, so two hundred rows are drawn from one address set once. Working out where row n begins would be n times 320, and this machine has no multiply. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01E2JrLzFvuFX9fgi1LDRjrW |
||
|
AnachronautandClaude Opus 5
|
1174bd9af5 |
Give the machine a frame to wait for
V3. The screen interrupts at each frame on hardware vector 0x30, and WAIT finally has something worth sleeping on. THERE WAS NO CLOCK. Every program that wanted to happen at a certain speed counted instructions and hoped, which is why Snake's pause silently halved the day a cycle stopped being an instruction and became a memory access - the program was right and the thing it was counting changed underneath it. A screen finishing sixty times a second is a real beat, and it is counted in the MACHINE'S cycles rather than the host's, so the same program sees the same number of frames in the same number of cycles however fast anything really ran. That is what makes a frame something a test can count and a recorded result can hold. Status bit 0 goes up when a frame has gone by and reading the status port puts it down, so a program with no handler can watch for it instead. Control bit 0 asks to be interrupted, and is OFF when the machine starts: an interrupt with nothing installed to catch it is a fault, so a screen that began interrupting the moment it was switched on would take down every program written before frames existed. More than one frame can pass between two looks, and the flag and the line are each one thing, so several still mean one of each. A missed frame is missed. Programs/Examples/frames.asm prints a dot a frame for a second: 1,000,324 cycles, and 996,460 of them spent asleep. That split is the thing worth seeing - a program that polled instead would print the same sixty dots, take the same second, and spend every cycle of it on the bus. Its header explains why waiting is not spinning and why a machine with a beat can stop guessing at one. Six checks in Tests/video.sh, and two of them are about the clock rather than the output, because the output cannot tell the difference. That the machine slept through nearly all of ten frames, and that polling three frames actually took three frames - a status flag that stayed up once set would print exactly the same character and look perfectly correct. Breaking the frame interrupt on purpose left a machine asleep for ever and hung the whole suite, which is a worse way to be told than a failing check. Tests/video.sh bounds its runs at ten seconds now, the way Tests/run.sh always has. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01E2JrLzFvuFX9fgi1LDRjrW |
||
|
AnachronautandClaude Opus 5
|
d6feddd1b6 |
Give the console colour and a cursor
COLOUR COSTS A NIBBLE AND NO HARDWARE. A glyph is drawn in palette indices 0 and 1, paper and ink, and a cell's attribute nibble adds sixteen to both - so sixteen banks is already sixteen ink and paper pairs, and all that was missing was a register saying which one the console draws in. That is port 0x06, read as well as written like the rest. The palette a machine wakes up with is arranged so that HIGHLIGHTING IS ONE BIT: banks 0 to 7 are colours on black, banks 8 to 15 are the same colours as paper with black ink. So attribute XOR 8 turns any pair inside out. That is a convention rather than a rule of the machine - the device only ever adds the nibble and looks the answer up - but it is the convention that makes a highlighted line and a cursor free. Bank 0 is still grey on black, so nothing that was written before this has changed colour. THE CURSOR IS THE SAME BIT AGAIN. It is drawn by turning its cell inside out rather than by putting a block over it, so the character underneath stays readable, which matters to somebody editing a line. The device draws it rather than the window, because on a machine with a screen a cursor is a hardware feature - one drawn by the presenter would not be in a picture the machine saved. It blinks on the machine's own clock, half a second each way, so the phase is a pure function of the cycle count and a screen saved at a given cycle is the same screen every time. A blink on the host's clock would have made every saved picture a matter of luck. Off unless asked for, with bit 2 of the control port. That is right for a machine - a program painting its own screen does not want something blinking in the middle of it - and CosmOS asks for one at boot. It also asks again when it takes the console back from a program that has stopped, because a program handing key mode back the way it was told to writes zero, which turns the cursor off. The shell owns the prompt, so the shell is what makes sure there is something blinking at it. Nine more checks in Tests/video.sh, to 41: that the attribute colours the ink and not the paper, that XOR 8 turns both, that it reads back, that a cursor appears where the registers put it and only when asked for, and that it goes dark again half a million cycles later. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01E2JrLzFvuFX9fgi1LDRjrW |
||
|
AnachronautandClaude Opus 5
|
773b0f8add |
Put CosmOS on the screen without changing a line of it
The console is now a display controller as well as a port: it owns a font, keeps a cursor, handles newline, carriage return, backspace and wrapping, and scrolls. That is an ordinary kind of chip - it is what a video terminal's character generator did - and it is the reason this rung needed no changes to CosmOS at all. CosmOS already writes bytes to port 0x00. It writes to BOTH the screen and standard output, which is deliberate. A machine with a screen and a serial line is an ordinary machine, the emulator's standard output is that serial line, and one console drives both. It is also what keeps all 165 recorded results passing under Voyager, and what makes --screen work on the plain SplitBit: there is one console and it drives everything it has. Scrolling moves the video device's origin and no memory. The row arriving at the bottom is cleared because the map is a ring and it holds what was there 128 rows ago; the rows going off the top are not, and that is a hundred rows of scrollback nothing had to keep. The test reads the register back rather than looking at the screen, because a console blitting rows instead would look identical and cost twelve percent of a frame for every line printed. The font is vendored from Hatchet-GPU with a note saying where it came from, since that repository is not part of this one. 135 glyphs in ASCII order, which is the thing that makes it worth keeping - PETSCII's whole inconvenience was that its order was not ASCII's, so a machine using it needed a translation table in front of every string. Here the machine subtracts 32. It is stored one bit a pixel and expanded into tile memory at reset: 1,088 bytes against 16 kilobytes. Voyager gets a keyboard. A window has no standard input, and a machine blocking on it inside a frame would stop drawing and stop answering, so a front end with a window installs a hook that the console calls while it has nothing: it keeps the window alive and hands back a key. The hook has to tell "nobody has typed yet", which happens sixty times a second, apart from "the window has gone", which is the end of input - one value for both would have made the first keystroke look like a closed machine. In line mode the console echoes what it is given, because there is no terminal behind a window to do it and that was always the terminal's job. Tests/video.sh grew from 14 checks to 26, half of them about the console rather than the device: those programs ask the video device for nothing and write bytes to port 0x00 like every SplitBit program always has. Verified by breaking two things - removing the scroll failed exactly the two checks about scrolling, and removing the cursor advance failed exactly the three that depend on it. Two video checks had quietly depended on palette entry 0 being black, which stopped being true the moment a machine woke up able to show text. They now set what they are about to look at, and a new check pins the waking state itself. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01E2JrLzFvuFX9fgi1LDRjrW |
||
|
AnachronautandClaude Opus 5
|
83623a3df3 |
Give the Voyager a screen
A tile engine on ports 0x30 to 0x3F, bringing one bank of video memory registered the way the disk's buffer is. The CPU writes cell indices and the device turns them into pixels, which is the whole reason a screen is affordable at a megahertz: a frame is 16,667 cycles, a full 320 by 200 picture is 64,000 bytes, and a 40 by 25 map is 2,000. A program that changes two cells writes four bytes. The cost of a screen becomes the number of cells that changed rather than the number of pixels on it. Which makes colour depth free, so the tiles are eight bits: an 8 by 8 cell is 64 pixels and each picks independently out of 256 colours, with no per-cell limit of the kind that made a Spectrum two and C64 multicolour four. The low nibble of a cell's attribute is ADDED to every index in its tile, sixteen at a time, so a tile drawn in 0 to 15 appears in any of sixteen schemes without a second copy in tile memory - and a tile wanting all 256 leaves the nibble at zero and gets them. Neither use costs the other anything. Two decisions are arithmetic rather than taste, and both come from the machine having no multiply. A map row is a page whether the mode fills it or not, so a cell address is the row number as the high byte and the doubled column as the low byte with no arithmetic at all; otherwise every cursor move on a 40 column screen would cost a row-times-40 in software. And a palette entry is four bytes rather than three, so entry n is at n times four, a shift. THE MAP IS A RING and the Scroll register says which of its 128 rows is on top. Scrolling moves a register and no memory: blitting a 40 by 25 screen up one line is 1,920 bytes inside one bank, which is twelve percent of a frame even with the controller widened, and a program printing one page would spend six frames shuffling memory. It is now one port write - and the rows that scrolled off are still there, which is where a terminal gets scrollback it never had. The device is part of the machine rather than part of the window. It renders into a buffer that is a pure function of video memory, so the same program draws the same picture with nobody watching; Voyager puts that buffer on the glass and decides nothing. Both binaries take --screen, which saves a PPM when the machine stops, and that is what makes a screen checkable on a host with no display at all. Tests/video.sh checks fourteen named behaviours rather than comparing a recorded image, because a recorded image would say "something changed" and leave which of the palette, the tile, the attribute, the map or the scroll register broke to be found by hand. Verified by breaking three things in turn: the additive nibble failed exactly one check, the scroll origin exactly two, and moving every cell one pixel sideways exactly the four about placement. Tests/docs.sh could not count past nine, which is how a suite of ten scripts reported itself as wrong for the wrong reason. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01E2JrLzFvuFX9fgi1LDRjrW |