dc7414932112e2b45a61ddf79b40ce1347205b80
2
Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
  AnachronautandClaude Opus 5
|
af0360128b |
Sixty four instructions becomes seventy
The six settled back on the twenty fourth, built now. RCAL and RRET are a call that puts nothing back. CALL restores A, B and Data Pointers 0 through 2, which costs ten bytes of Stack and is why a subroutine here can only hand anything back through Q, DP3 or memory. RCAL costs two and restores nothing, which is what a short leaf routine wants and is unsafe in exactly the way the name says. They are a pair because the frames are different sizes: returning from one through the other walks the Stack to somewhere that was never a return address. That was the user's correction to the original proposal, which had a raw call and no raw return. DPUA and DPDA offset a Data Pointer by A; DPUW and DPDW by A and B together, most significant first. DPUP and DPDN take a byte written into the program, so moving a pointer by something just worked out meant storing it and loading it back. Down as well as up on symmetry grounds, which was also the user's call - the argument against it came from counting uses in a corpus written under the constraint. The opcodes sit where they belong: 0x16 and 0x1E immediately below CALL and RET, and 0x4E through 0x51 at the end of the Data Pointer family. All six fit shapes that already existed, so instructiontable.py needed only set membership and both machine side copies of the table regenerated from it unchanged. Checked at every level it exists at: the emulator runs them, the host assembler encodes them, the monitor disassembles all six with the right lengths, and the assembler that runs on the machine builds a program using them byte for byte identically to the host - and that program runs. The recorded test measures what the two calls COST as well as what they put back, because an RCAL that quietly did what CALL does would still return to the right place. It does not survive that: returned through RRET, it hangs. docs.sh can read a two word number now. The count of instructions taking a Data Pointer went past twenty, and the pattern only allowed one word, so the check would have reported that the manual had stopped saying it rather than that the number was wrong. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01E2JrLzFvuFX9fgi1LDRjrW |
||
|
AnachronautandClaude Opus 5
|
0b6d2be43f |
CosmOS: a service interface for the disk and console, and the monitor in the shell
Two changes that arrived together because both live in cosmos.asm. THE SERVICES. A loaded program that wanted a file had to include the whole filesystem, carrying two and a half kilobytes of a private copy of code the system already had running, and then mount a disk that was already mounted. Five services are added at pinned numbers 20 to 24: osFileRead, osFileSave, osFileDelete, osFileRename and osPrintNumber. The sizes fit the registers exactly in both directions. A file that can be read into Data Memory is under 64K by definition, so its length is sixteen bits: coming back it is DP3, going out it is A and B together, and neither direction needs a record in memory whose shape both sides must agree on. There is deliberately no service to mount a disk. The system mounts one before its first prompt, and a program mounting it again was only ever a consequence of owning a second copy of the library, so that call disappears rather than moving. Apps/Files.asm writes, reads, renames and deletes a file in 645 bytes and includes nothing but the service names. THE MONITOR. Previously an application, now part of the shell, because an application occupies the one region a loaded application is given: a monitor that was an application could never examine another one, since loading the thing to be inspected would replace the thing doing the inspecting. "monitor" turns it on and the prompt becomes "*". It is a mode rather than a sub-prompt, and it persists: because the mode is a variable the prompt reads rather than a second loop, and every path back to the prompt goes through one place including osExit, a program started with "g" that gives the machine back arrives at the monitor prompt it was started from. Examining a program and running it therefore do not interrupt each other. "exit" leaves whatever you are in. It supersedes dump, and adds disassembly, writing bytes, and jumping to an address. Its instruction table is generated from the assembler's own list by Tests/instructiontable.py rather than typed again, and Tests/docs.sh checks both that the system's copy matches the generator and that the lengths that table implies are the ones the manual's Bytes column prints. A disassembler that disagreed about a length would not print one line wrong, it would lose its place and print everything after it wrong. Also here: b refuses a bank that is not registered, since asking the controller for one is refused and a refusal nobody catches stops the machine; g records the Stack the way run does, without which a program returning through osExit restored whatever the last run had left; and make cosmos-disk now depends on the system as well as the image. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |