-S writes every label and the address it was given, in address order.
Nothing else knows that. A program on the disk is bytes; the monitor can
disassemble it but has no idea what any of it is called. So counting which
addresses a program calls says a great deal and names nothing - the answer
arrives as a column of numbers and somebody works out by hand which routine
each one is inside.
It was deferred when the native assembler was planned, as a listing and symbol
dump nobody needed yet. Finding out where the assembler spends its time is what
needed it: the top six call targets were addresses until this existed and are
numStep, numCompare, tokGet, srcNext, numAddByte and clsSameName with it.
Sorted by address rather than by name, because the question asked of it is
always "what is at this address".
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01E2JrLzFvuFX9fgi1LDRjrW
"Binary" was doing three jobs. It meant an SPBT file that the machine starts
from; it meant whatever the assembler happened to produce, which is now
either that or a loadable program; and it meant a compiled host tool. A word
that means three things means none of them, and the first of the three has a
name already - this project has been calling them boot images for a while
and the manuals had not caught up.
Where it means an SPBT file -> boot image
Where it means either output -> output
Where it means a host executable -> left alone
Where it means base two -> left alone
The user facing messages move with it:
Error: No boot image specified.
Usage: ./SplitBit [OPTIONS] <boot image>
Error: This is not a SplitBit boot image.
Error: This boot image is in format version 2, and this emulator reads 1.
Successfully wrote SplitBit boot image to "hello.bin".
The assembler's own help was the interesting case. Its -o writes either
format, so "the binary" there was never right - it is "the output" now, and
the message that names the format is the one that says which it wrote.
No recorded output contained the word, so nothing needed re-blessing.
Checked before starting rather than after.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01E2JrLzFvuFX9fgi1LDRjrW
AnachronautandClaude Opus 5
Anachronaut