f1e5cc46f6ada15b4ad6487ffa89eb8d14a62f55
2
Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
  AnachronautandClaude Opus 5
|
588e02aff5 |
Double CosmOS's half of the machine, and check that it fits
The memory map gave CosmOS 0x0000 through 0x1FFF of Program Memory and applications 0x2000 and above. CosmOS is 8141 bytes at the previous commit, which is fifty one bytes short of the line, and the next thing added to it went over. GOING OVER DOES NOT FAIL WHERE IT HAPPENS. Nothing enforces the division: an application says where it goes with #Base and the loader puts it there, so a CosmOS that has grown past 0x1FFF simply has the next program loaded written over the end of it. What breaks is whichever part of the shell that program happened to cover, at whatever later moment somebody uses it. It turned up here as the monitor's assemble command answering "I do not know" to valid instructions, several commands into a session, on a machine that had booted perfectly well. Both halves are doubled: applications now start at 0x4000 in Program Memory and 0x2000 in Data Memory. That is 16K of code and 8K of data for the system, against the 8775 and 2948 it uses today. Both were on the same trajectory, and moving them together means the twenty files that say #Base are edited once rather than twice. The standalone loader's loadable.asm keeps its old base: it belongs to the loader CosmOS grew out of, not to CosmOS, and its addresses answer to a different program. The unbased-segment diagnostic keeps its old base too - it exists to produce an error message that names the address, and the message is what is recorded. Tests/docs.sh now reads the two limits out of the table in the README and measures both segments against them. It reads them rather than being told them because the table is the specification, and this is the second time in this project that the thing nobody checked is the thing that rotted. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01E2JrLzFvuFX9fgi1LDRjrW |
||
|
AnachronautandClaude Opus 5
|
3d2ab34229 |
Streaming: read a file bigger than the machine's memory
osFileRead hands over a whole file, which settles anything under 64K and settles nothing above it. CosmOS's own source is above it - the sources together are 104K against 64K of Data Memory - so a machine that is going to assemble itself needs another way to ask. osFileInfo (0d26) says how many blocks a file occupies. osFileBlock (0d27) hands over one of them and says how many of its bytes belong to the file. Between them a program reads a file of any size through a buffer of 256. Blocks rather than bytes from osFileInfo is forced, not chosen: a file on a sixteen megabyte disk is up to twenty four bits long and a pointer holds sixteen. osFileBlock's count answers in DP3 for the same kind of reason - a whole block is 256 bytes, which does not fit in a register, and a count that reported it as zero would make every reader special-case the end. Nothing is kept open. Every call names the file, so there is no handle to leak and nothing left behind by a program that stops halfway. Taken at its word that means searching the directory once per block, so the system remembers where the last file it was asked about lives; every path that can change what a name means calls fileForget, including the shell's own delete and rename, which do not go through the services. Correctness never depends on the cache - a cache thrown away is indistinguishable from one never filled. Measured on a 329 block file: 7% of the run saved when the file is the first directory entry, 11% when it is the sixteenth. These two say WHY when the answer is no, which the others do not. Elsewhere the only useful response to a failure is to give up, so one value suffices. These are asked questions, and running off the end is how a reader learns it has finished, so it gets an answer of its own: 1 no disk, 2 no such file, 3 past the end, 4 the disk refused. Apps/Stream.asm reads an 84,000 byte file through 256 bytes. The check that matters is the second one: a small file read BOTH ways - whole with osFileRead and streamed - with the two checksums compared, so streaming is measured against the path already known to work rather than against a number someone wrote down. The checksum is Fletcher's rather than a sum, because a sum is the same whatever order the bytes arrived in and the order is exactly what streaming has to get right. Both checksums were also confirmed against the same arithmetic run on the host. The rest of the test is the cache: two files read alternately catch a memory that missed the name changing, and a rename catches one that missed the file moving - and that one would otherwise pass, since the blocks are still there holding the same bytes. The test file is generated rather than taken from the repository. The CosmOS sources would be a truer picture and would move the recorded checksum every time a line of CosmOS was edited, putting a real difference in a crowd of meaningless ones - the same trap the cycle counts used to set. cosmosBreak's recorded output moves by two bytes in two pointers: SbfsIndex added two bytes to the filesystem's data and Break prints the system addresses the registers happened to hold. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01E2JrLzFvuFX9fgi1LDRjrW |