Commit Graph
25 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
AnachronautandClaude Opus 5 fba1b553d2 Depth: a ball behind the near pillars and in front of the far ones
The demo for what V5 added. Four pillars at four distances, each ONE 8 by
8 tile stretched to its own width and height, and a ball walking past all
of them at a distance between two.

What it shows is the thing an ordering cannot. The ball is sprite NOUGHT
and every pillar is numbered after it, so table order puts the ball in
front of all four - and it is still hidden behind two of them, because the
depth buffer is asked per column. Caught mid-straddle in the checks: the
ball is 48 wide and the pillar 32, so it shows on both sides and nowhere
across the middle.

Writing it found the conceptual trap in the feature, which is now written
down where somebody will hit it. The pillars first carried their own
distance in their entries AND wrote that same distance into their columns,
so each was asked whether it was in front of itself - and 20 is not nearer
than 20, so all four vanished. THE BUFFER IS WHAT HAS BEEN DRAWN AND A
SPRITE'S DEPTH IS A QUESTION ASKED OF IT. Scenery writes it; it does not
ask.

Also found that a scheme only gives a colour to index one. The default
palette sets each scheme's paper and ink and nothing between them, so
art drawn in index two comes out black until a program writes a palette.

And the fixture disk's root directory was full: four blocks, 32 entries,
all taken, so adding an app failed the whole disk build. Loudly, which is
the right way round - but it is a wall that moves for free, so it is eight
blocks and 64 entries now.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01E2JrLzFvuFX9fgi1LDRjrW
2026-09-02 15:58:34 -04:00
AnachronautandClaude Opus 5 cb898450b5 Sprites that scale, and a depth buffer to hide them behind
A target size in PIXELS rather than a multiplier, which is the whole of
why this is usable here. A billboard at distance d wants to be k/d pixels
tall, and that is a number a program has anyway - out of a lookup table,
most likely. A multiplier would have to be a fixed point fraction arrived
at by dividing, and this CPU cannot divide.

Zero on an axis means the natural size, so every sprite written before
scaling existed still means what it meant.

The two axes are independent, and that shape - one tile wide at its own
size, stretched to whatever height a distance says - is a wall column in a
pseudo-3D game. Measured: a DDA step costs 85 cycles, so 80 columns of ray
casting is about 85,000 cycles, or 12fps. Drawing those walls from the CPU
instead would be 256,000 writes, fifteen frames of cycles for one frame of
screen. The device doing the pixels is what makes such a game possible at
all here, not merely faster.

And a depth buffer, one byte a screen column at 0xD000, written by the
program. A sprite with a depth draws only in the columns it is in front
of. PER COLUMN, and that is the point: a billboard is nearer than the wall
at one end of itself and further at the other, and no ordering of the
table can say that. Table order settles sprites against each other; the
buffer settles them against the scenery. Zero means no test at both ends,
so a program that never writes it behaves as it did before it existed.

The entry grew from 8 bytes to 16 - now, while two programs use the table,
rather than once a game is written on it. Bytes 0 to 7 kept their
meanings, so Sprite.asm needed no change.

The pass is rewritten to walk where a sprite is GOING rather than where it
came from, which is what makes a stretch and a squash one operation. It
also made flipping fall out: turning the source coordinate round mirrors
the tile order and the pixels inside each tile in one step, where drawing
tile by tile had to be told to do both. All 111 checks passed unchanged at
natural size, which is what says the rewrite changed nothing it should not.

Clipping moved out of the inner loop and had to: a target size is sixteen
bits, so a sprite asked to be 60,000 pixels tall would have been sixty
thousand turns of a loop that drew eight rows.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01E2JrLzFvuFX9fgi1LDRjrW
2026-09-02 14:07:38 -04:00
AnachronautandClaude Opus 5 f8c3db5d56 A tool for breaking things, since doing it by hand went wrong twice
A check that passes proves nothing until it has been seen to fail. Doing
that by hand failed twice in two days, and BOTH TIMES IT LOOKED LIKE A
RESULT - the suite ran, went green, and read exactly like "this check does
not catch that".

Once the edit produced code that would not compile, make failed, the exit
status was not looked at, and the previous binary ran the suite. Once the
anchor was right and the filename was wrong, so nothing was edited at all.

Neither had anything to do with header dependencies, which have always
worked: DEPFLAGS is -MMD -MP and every .d is included. What was missing
was a harness that refuses to report a result it did not earn.

So Tests/break.sh checks every step of its own work and treats anything
unexpected as a hard error rather than a green run. Not finding the break
is the answer it exists to give, and it is worthless if it can also be the
answer when the break never happened. It restores the file on the way out,
including on an interrupt.

It is not in the suite and docs.sh does not count it, for the reason
makedisks.sh is not counted turned round - but being left out of the count
is not being left out of the manual, and that gap is where a script goes
undocumented for months. So docs.sh now requires both of them to be
described, and caught this one being missing.

Also: video.sh reads the fixture disks and does not build them, so after
make sanitize clears the build directory it reported SEVEN product-looking
failures for a missing file. It builds them now and says so.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01E2JrLzFvuFX9fgi1LDRjrW
2026-09-02 13:19:22 -04:00
AnachronautandClaude Opus 5 9eed23120f Four pages of tiles, in bits that were already there
A tile number is a byte and a byte reaches 256, which is not many once a
font has taken 135 of them and a game wants a character, a background and
a wall. Bits 4 and 5 of the attribute now say which page of 256 the
number is in - bits already written on every cell and every sprite, and
reserved for this since the attribute was defined.

Four pages of 16K is 64K, which is the whole atlas, so THE FOURTH PAGE IS
THE MEMORY THE SPRITE TABLE AND THE PALETTE ARE IN. That is not a hole in
the design; it is the answer shared video memory has always given, and it
is checked rather than forbidden. The atlas is 1024 tiles, and what a
program spends on sprites and colours comes out of them: no sprites means
page 3 is art, and sprites means 768 tiles and a reason.

The page is a property of the CELL and not a mode, so one screen shows
tiles from all four at once and nothing has to decide which page it is in.

Both places a tile is drawn from now ask one function where the art is.
They would otherwise drift: the sprite pass was written days after the map
pass and neither is where the other is looked at.

Nothing in CosmOS changes. The shell draws from page 0, which the screen
save covers; a tile left in another page is invisible unless a map cell
names that page, and the map is given back or cleared.

Both breaks were tried and both failed the checks - and the second had to
be tried twice, because the constant it needed lives in video.h and the
harness was only editing video.c. That is the same silent no-op as
yesterday's uncompiled break, in a different disguise.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01E2JrLzFvuFX9fgi1LDRjrW
2026-09-02 12:59:02 -04:00
AnachronautandClaude Opus 5 a916103a7f Sprites: things that move without the screen moving
Everything drawn on this machine was in a cell. Something between two
cells meant rewriting both; something moving a pixel at a time meant
rewriting them sixty times a second, which is affordable for one thing
and not for twenty. A sprite is put at a pixel and the device draws it
over whatever is behind, so moving it costs two bytes.

MADE OF TILES, which is the decision the rest follows from: m by n taken
in reading order from one index, so there is no second pixel format, no
second kind of memory, and nothing a sprite can show that the map cannot.
A 16 by 16 character is four tiles and the background can name the same
four.

256 entries of 8 bytes at 0xC000 in the atlas - eight so the entry
address is a shift, the same no-multiply argument as the palette's four.
Position is signed and sixteen bits, because 640 by 400 does not fit in a
byte and a sprite has to be able to sit half off the left rather than
appearing whole at the edge.

A PIXEL OF ZERO IS NOT DRAWN, or every sprite is a rectangle. Tested
before the attribute is added, so a hole belongs to the art and not to
the colour scheme. The same rule the other way round is what "behind"
means: drawn only where the background pixel was zero, so a thing walks
behind a pillar and in front of the floor in one frame.

All of them draw, every frame, so they cannot flicker. Real machines
dropped them per scanline because they had a fixed number of shift
registers; this has a loop. The limit is the size of the table, which is
a constant rather than a property of what is on screen.

And the system takes them down at exit. The sprite table sits in the gap
the screen save walks around - to the end of the map, then the palette -
and that is right, because nothing the shell draws is a sprite: there is
nothing to give back, only something to take away. Otherwise a program
that put a ball up and left would leave it over the prompt, in front of
everything, with nothing able to type it away. Sprite.asm deliberately
leaves its own, because a program that faulted could not have cleared it.

Every check here was re-broken and failed: transparency, reading order,
draw order, priority, and size. Size needed breaking twice - the first
attempt did not compile, and a silent build failure had left the old
binary passing.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01E2JrLzFvuFX9fgi1LDRjrW
2026-09-02 11:42:11 -04:00
AnachronautandClaude Opus 5 eee95ef0ce Flip says the true thing, and the checks that let it lie
Two bugs, both in what the demo claimed rather than in the device.

The assembler has no string escapes, so the "\n" written in a literal
printed as a backslash and an n. A newline is a byte; Say.asm has always
written one as 0x0A 0x00 and this now writes it out of the console port.

And the line whose whole job was to still be there afterwards was wiped
out on the way back, because the program called osTakeScreen - which
restores the screen AS IT WAS BEFORE, so the tidy-up erased the one thing
the demo was pointing at. It did not need saving: nothing it touches is
the shell's. A program that damages nothing should not ask, and asking
anyway costs it the screen it was standing on.

Which turned out to be untrue as written, and that is the third thing.
Flip drew with a tile of its own, and the system copies the font back
over every tile at exit - so the filled screen went blank the moment the
program left, and the check that the system put the display back could
not tell a restored screen from an abandoned one. It passed with the
restore deleted. So did the check that a program can show the other
screen at all: a blank screen counts as one colour just as well as a
filled one does.

Now it fills with 0x0A, which is an asterisk in one of the reversed
colour schemes: paper is the colour and ink is black, so a whole screen
is drawn with NO TILE REDEFINED and it survives leaving. Both checks ask
for the commonest colour in the picture rather than counting colours or
naming a pixel - the font's only blank glyph is the space, whose
attribute nibble is nought, so a filled screen is always a pattern and
which pixel lands on paper depends on the character.

Both were re-broken afterwards and both failed this time.

Also cosmosFlip, a transcript test, which is what would have caught the
printed backslash in the first place.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01E2JrLzFvuFX9fgi1LDRjrW
2026-09-02 11:08:09 -04:00
AnachronautandClaude Opus 5 023362b05a A second screen, and one port to say which is shown
A screen drawn where it can be seen is seen half drawn. A program that
moves forty things and rewrites the map underneath them is wrong for as
long as it takes to put them all right, and at a megahertz that is long
enough to look at.

So the device brings a second screen bank, on port 0x3B, and port 0x3C
says which of the two is displayed. Everything a program draws into the
other one is invisible until one byte shows the whole of it at once.

ONE REGISTER IS ENOUGH, where the hardware this imitates needed two. The
other said which screen the CPU's window pointed at; there is no window
here, because a program reaches a bank through the memory controller by
its number. Writing to the screen that is not shown is a matter of naming
its bank, and the device never has to be told.

And a flip cannot tear: a frame is drawn from one bank in one go, so a
flip either happened before that frame or happens before the next. There
is nothing to race, where the real machines had to catch the few lines
between frames to swap in.

The console draws into whichever screen is displayed rather than one of
its own, so a fault message lands where somebody can read it even if a
game had flipped. And CosmOS puts the displayed screen back at exit, the
way it already puts back the cursor and the ink: a program that faulted
while flipped could not have, and a shell that only came out right for
programs which remembered would come out wrong the day one crashed.

Flip.asm is the worked example. It deliberately does NOT restore the
display itself - that is the point of the paragraph above, and it is what
makes the system's guarantee the thing under test rather than the
program's good manners. Written the other way round first, where it
passed with the guarantee deleted.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01E2JrLzFvuFX9fgi1LDRjrW
2026-09-02 10:31:29 -04:00
AnachronautandClaude Opus 5 66e7b84272 The screen is two banks: an atlas and a screen
Tiles and colours are written when a program loads; the map is written
whenever anything moves. Sharing one 64K bank made them compete for room
neither needed all of, and had a worse consequence than being cramped: a
bitmap covers the whole bank, so entering bitmap mode destroyed the font.
A program could not draw a picture and then say anything about it.

Split, each gets a whole bank. The atlas holds the tiles and the palette,
the screen holds the map or a bitmap, and a picture now costs the map and
nothing else. It also leaves 48K free in the atlas, which is where the
sprite table and a second page of tiles are going.

No new mechanism was needed. A bank is registered by naming the port that
owns it, so a device with two banks needs two ports that own memory: the
base port keeps the atlas, since tiles have been at 0x0000 since there was
a screen at all, and 0x3A owns the screen. The registry now answers
honestly about which ports in the block bring memory, where it used to say
all sixteen did.

CosmOS never addresses video memory except in one place - the screen save,
which walks 196 pages of it. The page number already says which bank a page
is in, so screenBankFor works it out rather than keeping a second list
beside screenPageFor. Grid and picture.asm register both banks; colours.asm
only touches the palette and needed none of it.

Tests/video.sh names the memory every write is for, because an address
cannot: tile 5 and bitmap pixel 5 are both 0x0005, and a helper that
guessed would be right for the tiles and silently wrong for a picture.

And picture.asm gained a check, because this change broke it and nothing
noticed - registering the second bank leaves DestBank pointing at it, so
the palette went into the wrong one and the picture came out black. It was
the only thing here found by looking rather than by a test.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01E2JrLzFvuFX9fgi1LDRjrW
2026-09-02 10:09:53 -04:00
AnachronautandClaude Opus 5 f97d15de08 The font comes from a chip, not from RAM that remembers
videoReset zeroed video memory and then wrote the font and the sixteen colour
schemes into it, and the comment above that said out loud what was wrong with
it: "everything here is ordinary video memory". RAM does not wake up with
anything in it. That was the last piece of magic in this device, and it looked
harmless until something wanted the font BACK - a program that redefines a glyph
had destroyed the only copy there was.

So the device has a character generator, the way the machines this one is
pretending to be really did, and the copy into RAM is a thing it DOES rather
than a state it mysteriously starts in. Command port 0x39: bit 0 for the font,
bit 1 for the schemes.

THE RAM IS STILL RAM. A program may overwrite every glyph and every colour and
should be able to, which is what makes this a tile engine rather than a text
display. What changed is that it is no longer a one way door.

NEITHER COMMAND CLEARS WHAT IT DOES NOT OWN. The font used to clear the whole of
tile memory before writing itself, which was harmless while it happened only at
reset and is wrong the moment a program can ask: a program that defined a tile
of its own and then wanted its text back would have paid for it with the tile.

The reason it is a chip rather than a file on the disk, which was the other
candidate: the boot chain prints before CosmOS exists. Stage one prints "?" when
there is nothing to boot, and if the font came off the disk then the message
about the disk having failed would be the one thing that could not be drawn. A
system that wants its own font still loads one over the top - the ROM is the
floor, not the policy.

Two things that had been worked around now simply work. The shell asks for both
whenever a program exits, so a program that redefined a letter no longer leaves
it unable to spell, and Grid no longer needs to have saved the screen to avoid
handing back green text on blue. And the fault screen asks for the glyphs first,
because a message spelled in somebody's tile graphics is no message at all.

Five video checks. Two runs each for the font and the schemes, since the map
holds a tile NUMBER and the glyph is looked up when the frame is drawn - so
restoring changes every cell using it, including ones drawn before, and what the
two runs differ by is the command. The third guards the decision not to clear:
tile 200 has to survive the font coming back.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01E2JrLzFvuFX9fgi1LDRjrW
2026-09-01 16:21:24 -04:00
AnachronautandClaude Opus 5 fd9c4c75f8 Tell the person where it hurts
A fault stopped the machine and printed a line to standard error. On a terminal
that is a diagnosis. Behind a window it is a frozen picture and no reason at
all, because the message went somewhere nobody was looking - the machine looked
hung and was not. It had stopped, and said so invisibly.

CosmOS catches all five faults now and says what happened on the screen, with
the address, in red.

A FAULT ENDS THE PROGRAM, NOT THE MACHINE. That is the answer to "carry on or
start again", and it is not a compromise: a bare RETI from most of these meets
the instruction that failed and fails again, so carrying on was never on offer.
But the machine is almost never what is broken. Everything the shell puts back
when a program exits - the Stack, its vectors, the drive, the working directory,
the console, the screen - is exactly what wants putting back after one dies, so
the handler sets a status and joins handleExit. You are back at the prompt, and
the program is recorded as having STOPPED rather than finished, because saying
"finished" under a red fault message would be the shell contradicting itself.

A fault below where programs load is the system's own, and there is nothing to
go back to. That one says so and stops.

THE SCREEN GOES BACK TO A MODE TEXT CAN BE SEEN IN, and that is the part that
matters rather than the part that is prettiest. A program that faulted in bitmap
mode left the console with no text rows, so it draws nothing at all: the message
would be perfectly correct and completely invisible, which is the one thing it
must never be. Two palette entries go back for the same reason, since a program
that wrote its own colours can leave every ink the same as every paper. Only the
two the message needs, so the rest of what the program chose is left alone.

Both halves are checked by looking at the PICTURE, because the serial line was
never where the problem was. Crash blind ruins the palette and drops into bitmap
mode before it faults; without the mode the screen comes back 320 by 200 with
nothing on it, and without the palette it is the right size with the message
present and unreadable. Each break loses the red on its own.

Crash is also a program worth having: it breaks in whichever of the five ways
you name, so a fault screen can be looked at without having written a bug first.

Two things found on the way:

The native assembler keeps its OWN copy of the reserved vector names, so it did
not know NoHandler or NoDevice and built a cosmos.bin that differed from the
host assembler's. Caught by native.sh, which is exactly the drift that test
exists for.

And cosmosMonitor had dead input. It assembles code into 0x8000 and runs it, and
that code faults - which used to kill the machine, so everything after it in the
file had never run. It runs now, and the recording grew by sixty lines of
monitor session that had been unreachable since the day the fault was put there.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01E2JrLzFvuFX9fgi1LDRjrW
2026-09-01 15:08:20 -04:00
AnachronautandClaude Opus 5 2a29cebc6b Make the screen come back on the machine people actually run
Found by running it: Grid exits and the shell prints its prompt into the
grid, with the view up to seven pixels out of alignment. Three faults, and
the first is the one that made the other two visible.

MAKE RUN-VOYAGER HAD NO SCRATCH DRIVE. It gives drive 1 to Disks/personal.img,
which is a file and not volatile, so there was nowhere to keep a screen -
osTakeScreen answered no and the whole feature silently did not happen. It
was tested with --ram-disk and shipped without one, which is as good a
description of testing the wrong machine as I can write. There is now a RAM
disk in drive 2, after the personal disk so that drive 1 stays the one that
is yours.

A PROGRAM TOLD NO MUST COPE. A refusal is not a fault, it means doing what
the program did before there was anywhere to save a screen. Grid deleted
its own tidying up when it started asking, so being refused left the grid
on screen with a prompt written into it. It clears up again when refused,
and only then.

AND THE SYSTEM ALWAYS LEAVES THE SCREEN USABLE. The fine scroll registers
go back to zero at every program exit, whether or not the picture could be
saved: the console draws in whole cells, so a view three pixels into one
puts every character three pixels out for ever. That is not part of saving
a screen and should never have depended on it.

Both paths are checked now. With a scratch drive the screen comes back cell
for cell; without one, no grid is left behind. Breaking either fails one of
them and not the other.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01E2JrLzFvuFX9fgi1LDRjrW
2026-08-31 20:31:26 -04:00
AnachronautandClaude Opus 5 ab72443b99 Give the screen back: osTakeScreen, and the RAM disk earns its keep
A program that takes the whole screen leaves the shell a blank one, and
whatever was on it is gone. There was nowhere to put 48K of video memory on
a machine with 64K of Data Memory that CosmOS already lives in.

A DRIVE MADE OF MEMORY IS SOMEWHERE. The screen goes to a file on the
scratch drive - the first volatile drive found at boot - like any other
file, and comes back from handleExit alongside the vectors and console mode
already put back there. The filesystem does the allocating, so this
invented nothing: it is 196 pages of tiles, map and palette, with a block
on the front holding the cursor, the four scroll registers and the mode.

NOT AUTOMATIC, and that is the whole design. Saving on every program start
would be cheap enough; restoring on every exit would be wrong, because dir
and Files and Say print and stop and their output is the reason you ran
them. A program says it took the screen, and one that says nothing behaves
exactly as every program did before this existed.

It deleted thirty lines of Grid, and they were all wrong anyway: four
scroll registers put back by hand, the map filled with spaces, the cursor
sent home, palette bank 0 written out - and the other fifteen banks kept
Grid's colours, because there was nowhere to have kept the real ones. Grid
is 64 bytes smaller and gives back what was actually there.

The check compares the screen before against the screen after, CELL BY
CELL, and allows only the rows around the cursor to differ - found from
where the text ends rather than guessed at, because the first version
assumed the cursor was near the bottom of the screen and let three real
differences through.

Two things cost time and neither was the feature:

  - An edit adding "SWI osTakeScreen" to Grid was in the same script as a
    failing s.index, so the file was never written - and the COMMENT
    describing the call did land, from a later edit. Grid documented a call
    it did not make, and read as though it should have worked.
  - docs.sh caught osTakeScreen having no row in the services table, which
    is the check the service layer added for exactly this and the second
    time it has earned itself.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01E2JrLzFvuFX9fgi1LDRjrW
2026-08-31 18:47:44 -04:00
AnachronautandClaude Opus 5 1aa45fcfc4 Grid: fill the map, not the window
Scrolling sideways walked off the end of what the program had filled, so
the grid went blank for six seconds and then came round again. A map row
holds 128 cells - 256 bytes at two a cell, whatever mode the screen is in -
and an eighty column screen shows eighty of them, so 48 were empty.

This is the third thing this loop has counted and the first right one. It
said forty, which filled half the screen. Then it asked the screen how wide
it was, which fixed what could be seen and was still wrong. ASKING THE
SCREEN IS RIGHT FOR FILLING A SCREEN AND WRONG FOR FILLING A MAP: a program
writing one screenful wants the window, and a program that scrolls wants
everything the window can be moved over. There is no register for that
because it is a property of video memory rather than of the display.

The check that should have caught it did not, and that is the more useful
half. periodic.py looked at 32 pixels - four cells at the left edge - so it
could not see a gap that was on the right, and at the cycle count it samples
the origin had moved to column 22 and the gap was off in the middle
distance. It reads the whole scanline now and says which column the picture
stops repeating at, which is how the two failures above were told apart.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01E2JrLzFvuFX9fgi1LDRjrW
2026-08-30 19:00:28 -04:00
AnachronautandClaude Opus 5 bcd42e75ca Scroll the screen sideways, and by less than a cell
The screen could move one way, a cell at a time. Three registers were
missing and this adds them: a column origin so the map can be wider than
the screen as well as taller, and a pixel remainder for each axis so the
step can be one pixel rather than eight.

  0x36  Scroll column, in cells, wrapping at 128
  0x37  Fine X, 0 to 7 pixels
  0x38  Fine Y, 0 to 7 pixels

FINE DOES NOT CARRY INTO COARSE. Writing 8 to a fine register writes 0,
because only its low three bits mean anything. The alternative was for a
write of 8 to step the coarse register, and it was rejected for one reason:
a program that scrolls has to know where it has got to, and if the hardware
carries then the only way to find out is to read the register back. Keeping
them apart means the program already knows, because it did the arithmetic
itself. It is also what the machines this one is pretending to be did.

The renderer now draws one more row and one more column than fit and clips
them, because with a fine offset the screen no longer begins on a cell
boundary and the cells at two edges are partly off it.

videoPutCell follows the column origin as it has always followed the row -
a caller means a cell of the SCREEN, and the screen is a window onto the
map. The fine offsets are deliberately not applied there: they move the
finished picture by less than a cell, and there is no such thing as less
than a cell to write into. So a program may scroll to any pixel without the
console's idea of where row three, column five is moving underneath it.

Grid now scrolls diagonally, a pixel a frame, in four port writes and two
carries. It moved eight pixels every fourth frame before, which reads as
the picture jumping rather than travelling.

Seven checks, each one the same program with one register changed, so what
is compared is where the picture stopped. Breaking fine X, fine Y, the
column origin, the three-bit mask, or the console's use of the origin each
fails exactly one of them.

Grid's own two checks had to be rewritten, and the reason is worth keeping:
they asked whether pixel 4 was a grid line, which was really a check that
the scroll happened to be at a cell boundary. A picture that moves a pixel
a frame can only be asked things that are true at every offset - that it
repeats every eight pixels, and that one band of eight rows holds different
colours from the next.

Also repairs docs.sh, which found the minimal CosmOS application by taking
the first asm block in the README. Documenting a program with an example
above it made that a different block, and the check complained that the
minimal application had no #Base about something that never claimed to be
one. It looks under System Services now.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01E2JrLzFvuFX9fgi1LDRjrW
2026-08-30 18:52:15 -04:00
AnachronautandClaude Opus 5 1a8a5efe03 Grid: the first program to use the screen as a screen
Everything drawn on this machine so far has been text or a bitmap. The tile
engine has been there since the screen was built and only the console had
touched it, and only ever to put a letter in a cell - the one thing it can
do that a plain character display could do too.

Grid redefines a tile, fills all 128 map rows with it, and scrolls by
writing ONE BYTE A FRAME. Nothing moves. The rows above and below the
screen are already drawn, so a screenful of movement costs one OUTA and the
rows that leave the top are still there.

Its tile goes at 200 because the machine wakes with the font in tile memory
- glyph n at tile n, for 135 of the 256 - so a program starting at zero
paints over the alphabet and the shell it is about to hand the machine back
to. Its sixteen colour bands are one tile and not sixteen: the attribute
nibble is added to every index in a cell, so the same 64 bytes come out in
sixteen colourings.

Three things it cost, all of them the same lesson about this machine:

  - "SETD.0 X" then "STD.0.1" stores through DP1, which had not been set
    yet. It assembles, and the blit then reads its 64 bytes from wherever
    DP1 was last left, so the tile came out as noise.
  - The palette entry for scheme n is at 0xFC00 + 64n, which reaches
    0xFFC0 - four pages, not one. And doubling A by adding B needs B to
    hold A, which RSTB is the opposite of. Both went away by writing all
    256 entries in order and letting the controller step the address, so
    nothing computes an address at all.
  - The screen it hands back had the right cells and the wrong colours,
    because restoring the map is not restoring the palette.

That last one is a gap in the machine rather than in this program, and is
written up in the CosmOS README. The console's colours live at exactly the
entries the attribute nibble lands on, so any program using the nibble
overwrites them and has nowhere else to write. Grid puts bank 0 back - grey
on black - and leaves the other fifteen. The real answer is a command to
the screen meaning "give me back what you woke up with", the way the
console has one for clearing. There is not one, and this is the first
program that ever wanted it.

Two checks in video.sh, which boots the whole system and reads the pixels
the renderer produced rather than trusting what the program believed.
Breaking the tile fails one and breaking the attribute fails the other.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01E2JrLzFvuFX9fgi1LDRjrW
2026-08-30 17:38:30 -04:00
AnachronautandClaude Opus 5 0e0731e2b1 Put the cursor home when the screen is cleared
A screen with nothing on it and a cursor half way down it is not a cleared
screen: the next thing written lands where the last thing happened to leave
off, at a position whose meaning was just erased. The shell's clear did
exactly that, and left the next line one row below wherever it had been.

Both halves were missing. consoleClearScreen blanks the cells and does not
touch cursorRow or cursorColumn, and 2J on a terminal empties the screen
without moving anything - H is what puts the cursor at the top.

Life and Snake never showed this because they follow their clear with an
explicit 1;1H of their own. They were working around it, which is why the
bug survived until a command cleared the screen and then let somebody type.

The attribute is deliberately not reset. Clearing is about what is on the
screen rather than how the next thing will be drawn, and a program that
chose a colour and then cleared still wants that colour - which is what a
terminal does too.

Two checks in video.sh, and they took two goes to make independent. The
first pointed at the row where the letter lands when the cursor is NOT
homed, so removing the clear and removing the homing failed the same pair
and neither said which. The second now looks at a row nothing writes to
either way - and at a letter whose ink actually reaches the pixel it reads,
which "two" did not, so it passed on a screen that had never been cleared.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01E2JrLzFvuFX9fgi1LDRjrW
2026-08-30 17:08:27 -04:00
AnachronautandClaude Opus 5 13b20c8834 Give the screen a bitmap mode
V4. Mode 2 is 320 by 200 with a byte a pixel: no tile to look up and no attribute to add,
the byte IS the palette index. Programs/Examples/picture.asm fills a whole one in 127 bytes
of program and 47,498 cycles.

IT IS THE SAME MEMORY AS THE TILES AND THE MAP, which is what shared video memory has always
been, and there is nowhere else it could be - 64,000 bytes of picture in a 65,536 byte bank
leaves room for nothing beside it. Going to bitmap mode does not clear the text screen, it
stops calling it one, and coming back finds the tiles holding whatever the picture put there.
Taking the screen means taking it.

The palette moves to 0xFC00, the top of video memory, because it is the one thing that has to
mean the same in every mode and 64,000 bytes of picture leaves nowhere in the middle for it
to hide. That is a documented address, so the example, the tests and the manual move with it.

A BITMAP HAS NO COLUMNS AND NO ROWS, and both registers read zero rather than a leftover from
the last mode. The console asks: told there is no character screen, it has nowhere to put a
glyph and draws nothing, while still saying everything down the serial line. The honest
alternative is what a machine with shared video memory really does, which is scribble marks
nobody can read across somebody's picture - honest and useless, since a program that has
taken the screen has not stopped wanting to print.

Six checks in Tests/video.sh, to 55: that the mode is 320 by 200, that a byte is one pixel's
colour and only that pixel, that printing leaves a picture alone while the letter still goes
out, and that the columns register says nought and then forty again.

The example is worth reading for one thing beyond the mode: Fill leaves its destination past
what it touched, so two hundred rows are drawn from one address set once. Working out where
row n begins would be n times 320, and this machine has no multiply.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01E2JrLzFvuFX9fgi1LDRjrW
2026-08-29 10:44:15 -04:00
AnachronautandClaude Opus 5 1174bd9af5 Give the machine a frame to wait for
V3. The screen interrupts at each frame on hardware vector 0x30, and WAIT finally has
something worth sleeping on.

THERE WAS NO CLOCK. Every program that wanted to happen at a certain speed counted
instructions and hoped, which is why Snake's pause silently halved the day a cycle stopped
being an instruction and became a memory access - the program was right and the thing it was
counting changed underneath it. A screen finishing sixty times a second is a real beat, and
it is counted in the MACHINE'S cycles rather than the host's, so the same program sees the
same number of frames in the same number of cycles however fast anything really ran. That is
what makes a frame something a test can count and a recorded result can hold.

Status bit 0 goes up when a frame has gone by and reading the status port puts it down, so a
program with no handler can watch for it instead. Control bit 0 asks to be interrupted, and
is OFF when the machine starts: an interrupt with nothing installed to catch it is a fault,
so a screen that began interrupting the moment it was switched on would take down every
program written before frames existed.

More than one frame can pass between two looks, and the flag and the line are each one
thing, so several still mean one of each. A missed frame is missed.

Programs/Examples/frames.asm prints a dot a frame for a second: 1,000,324 cycles, and 996,460
of them spent asleep. That split is the thing worth seeing - a program that polled instead
would print the same sixty dots, take the same second, and spend every cycle of it on the
bus. Its header explains why waiting is not spinning and why a machine with a beat can stop
guessing at one.

Six checks in Tests/video.sh, and two of them are about the clock rather than the output,
because the output cannot tell the difference. That the machine slept through nearly all of
ten frames, and that polling three frames actually took three frames - a status flag that
stayed up once set would print exactly the same character and look perfectly correct.

Breaking the frame interrupt on purpose left a machine asleep for ever and hung the whole
suite, which is a worse way to be told than a failing check. Tests/video.sh bounds its runs
at ten seconds now, the way Tests/run.sh always has.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01E2JrLzFvuFX9fgi1LDRjrW
2026-08-29 10:24:09 -04:00
AnachronautandClaude Opus 5 ff4b025058 Make the cursor blink while the machine is waiting, and show how the palette works
THE CURSOR DID NOT BLINK, and the reason is worth stating: it blinks on the machine's clock,
and the machine's clock had stopped. A console waiting on a key stops the CPU, so no cycles
passed, so the phase never moved - and the one moment somebody is looking at a cursor is the
moment they are being asked to type.

Waiting is now charged as IDLE CYCLES, which is what they were built for: a machine stopped
on a device is not using memory, the same distinction WAIT makes, arrived at from the other
direction. And the devices are told as it happens rather than when the instruction finally
finishes, because a display controller does not stop blinking because the processor is
waiting on a keyboard, any more than a disk stops turning.

A keyboard file can now say NOTHING happened. A zero is a byte no keyboard sends, so it is
free to mean "a moment went by with nobody typing" - which is the commonest thing behind a
window and the only thing a file otherwise could not express. That unlocked the whole waiting
path: three checks that the cursor is lit, then dark half a second later, then lit again,
which is what blinking is.

And Programs/Examples/colours.asm, because the palette had nowhere a newcomer could read it.
It prints the sixteen pairs, prints each one again turned inside out, and then CHANGES ONE by
writing three bytes into the palette - so the difference between using the colours a machine
wakes up with and choosing your own is visible in one program. Its header explains what a
cell is, what the attribute nibble does, why palette entries are four bytes rather than
three, and why video memory has to be reached through the controller.

The manual now says where the palette lives and points at it.

SplitLint found a redundant RSTA in the example, which was worth acting on rather than
suppressing: the zero was already in A from the mode write two lines up, and saying so in a
comment teaches that SETD does not touch A, which is a thing worth knowing.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01E2JrLzFvuFX9fgi1LDRjrW
2026-08-29 08:26:15 -04:00
AnachronautandClaude Opus 5 d6feddd1b6 Give the console colour and a cursor
COLOUR COSTS A NIBBLE AND NO HARDWARE. A glyph is drawn in palette indices 0 and 1, paper
and ink, and a cell's attribute nibble adds sixteen to both - so sixteen banks is already
sixteen ink and paper pairs, and all that was missing was a register saying which one the
console draws in. That is port 0x06, read as well as written like the rest.

The palette a machine wakes up with is arranged so that HIGHLIGHTING IS ONE BIT: banks 0 to
7 are colours on black, banks 8 to 15 are the same colours as paper with black ink. So
attribute XOR 8 turns any pair inside out. That is a convention rather than a rule of the
machine - the device only ever adds the nibble and looks the answer up - but it is the
convention that makes a highlighted line and a cursor free.

Bank 0 is still grey on black, so nothing that was written before this has changed colour.

THE CURSOR IS THE SAME BIT AGAIN. It is drawn by turning its cell inside out rather than by
putting a block over it, so the character underneath stays readable, which matters to
somebody editing a line. The device draws it rather than the window, because on a machine
with a screen a cursor is a hardware feature - one drawn by the presenter would not be in a
picture the machine saved.

It blinks on the machine's own clock, half a second each way, so the phase is a pure
function of the cycle count and a screen saved at a given cycle is the same screen every
time. A blink on the host's clock would have made every saved picture a matter of luck.

Off unless asked for, with bit 2 of the control port. That is right for a machine - a
program painting its own screen does not want something blinking in the middle of it - and
CosmOS asks for one at boot. It also asks again when it takes the console back from a
program that has stopped, because a program handing key mode back the way it was told to
writes zero, which turns the cursor off. The shell owns the prompt, so the shell is what
makes sure there is something blinking at it.

Nine more checks in Tests/video.sh, to 41: that the attribute colours the ink and not the
paper, that XOR 8 turns both, that it reads back, that a cursor appears where the registers
put it and only when asked for, and that it goes dark again half a million cycles later.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01E2JrLzFvuFX9fgi1LDRjrW
2026-08-29 08:13:28 -04:00
AnachronautandClaude Opus 5 43a05b3df1 Replace the escape parser with cursor registers
The console had grown an ANSI parser, and that was the wrong shape. ANSI exists because a
screen used to be on the other end of a serial line and a byte stream was the only channel
there was. This screen is memory the program can already address, so reaching it by sending
characters for a state machine to take apart is a middleman for something the machine does
better - and it meant accepting an open protocol somebody else defines, in hardware, with no
natural end to it. Everything else on this machine is registers.

So the console gets three: cursor row at 0x03, cursor column at 0x04, and a command port at
0x05 where 1 clears the screen. Both cursor registers are READ as well as written, which is
the thing an escape cannot do without sending a query and parsing a reply - a routine that
wants to put the cursor back where it found it can now ask.

Clearing is one command against a thousand cells walked one at a time. Snake and Life are
smaller for it: 2,168 bytes to 2,163 and 1,410 to 1,396.

A HOST TERMINAL STILL SPEAKS ANSI, and bridging to the host is the emulator's job, the same
job it does reading standard input. So the escapes are now GENERATED, outbound, for the set
this device chooses, rather than parsed inbound as though the machine were a terminal. The
set cannot grow behind our backs because we are the ones saying it. The cursor is announced
lazily, at the next character rather than at the register write, so setting a row and a
column costs one sequence rather than two.

The console's block widens from three ports to six, which registryTest noticed: it had been
asking about port 0x05 precisely BECAUSE nothing was there, and the console had just moved
in. Re-blessing it would have left it checking nothing, so it asks about 0x80 instead -
clear of the console, the disk, the screen, the controller, and the sound device coming to
0x40.

Six checks in Tests/video.sh swapped from the sequences to the registers, including that the
cursor reads back and that one sent past the edge is clamped rather than refusing. Those
checks also stopped counting bytes from the ends of a file, which had quietly started
measuring an escape the moment the console began announcing the cursor.

SplitLint caught the one thing worth catching in the port: the clear command leaves A at 1
and key mode is also 1, so the second load looks redundant. Acting on it would tie a console
command to a console mode by coincidence, and break silently if either ever moved, so it is
suppressed with that reason rather than removed.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01E2JrLzFvuFX9fgi1LDRjrW
2026-08-28 23:08:52 -04:00
AnachronautandClaude Opus 5 556a14b288 Teach the console the sequences the corpus already speaks, and let the status port see the window
Three things Snake found the moment somebody ran it in a window, and all three are the same
kind of mistake: the console grew a screen and kept asking the terminal.

IT COULD NOT CLEAR THE SCREEN. Every program here that moves a cursor does it with ANSI
escapes, because until there was a screen the thing on the other end was somebody's
terminal. The controller drew "[2J" as three letters and left the board underneath. It now
parses them, which is what a video terminal did - a VT100 is exactly this. The whole corpus
uses two, ESC[2J and ESC[H, and the general shape is recognised so anything else is
swallowed rather than drawn: a sequence nobody implemented should leave no marks. Cursor
positioning is in too, since it is the same parse and one line more.

IT DID NOT SEE KEYS FROM THE WINDOW, but did when the terminal behind it was focused, which
is the whole diagnosis in one sentence. Snake polls the READY bit and never blocks, and
consoleFetch - what the status port asks - was polling standard input regardless of whether
a front end had installed a hook. So a window's keys were invisible to every program that
looks before it reads, and a keystroke aimed at the terminal would be picked up instead.

The hook now takes a question. Zero is the status port looking, and must not present or
sleep: a program polling in a loop would otherwise be charged a frame for every glance. One
is the data port blocking, where presenting is exactly right, because a machine waiting for
a key is still a machine somebody is looking at. One value for both would have made either
polling ruinous or waiting dead.

AND IT RAN SLOWLY, which was the same bug wearing a hat: a game that never receives a
steering key is a game that only ever goes one way.

Six more checks in Tests/video.sh, to 32: that ESC[2J clears, that ESC[H goes to the corner
without disturbing what is drawn, that ESC[3;5H counts rows and columns from one, and that
an unknown sequence is swallowed and leaves nothing behind.

The hook itself is still the one thing here the suite cannot reach - it exists only when
there is a window, and this host has no display. It was found by a person playing Snake,
which is where the Test Manual says these go on being found.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01E2JrLzFvuFX9fgi1LDRjrW
2026-08-28 22:43:27 -04:00
AnachronautandClaude Opus 5 6f8ad42277 Fill the window, let it be resized, and make black black
Three things a person looking at a real screen found in five minutes, none of which the
headless tests could have seen.

THE PICTURE FILLED A QUARTER OF THE WINDOW. The window opened at the largest screen the
device can make, doubled, and then drew a 320 by 200 mode at that same doubling - so three
quarters of it was bezel. It now takes the largest whole-number scale that fits: the two
modes are exactly a factor of two apart and the window opens at twice the larger, so both
fill it exactly, at four and at two. Changing mode changes how sharp the screen is rather
than how big it is.

Whole numbers on purpose. A 320 by 200 picture stretched by 2.7 has some rows twice as tall
as their neighbours, which on eight pixel glyphs is the difference between text and mush.

THE WINDOW WOULD NOT RESIZE. It does now, and the picture rescales to whatever it becomes,
still in whole pixels and still centred. How big somebody wants a screen is not the
machine's business.

AND BLACK WAS NOT BLACK. Both the paper and the bezel were tinted towards green, on the
theory that a phosphor never was neutral. On a real screen that reads as a fault rather
than as character: a background that is nearly black looks like a background that failed to
be black. Paper is black now and ink is a neutral grey, because a default should be the
unsurprising thing - anything with a point of view about colour is 254 palette entries away
and belongs to a program. The bezel is a clearly lighter grey, so what is left over when
the window's shape does not match the picture's looks like a bezel rather than like more
screen.

The two checks that name the waking colours name the new ones. That they had to change is
the check working: they say what they depend on rather than assuming it.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01E2JrLzFvuFX9fgi1LDRjrW
2026-08-28 22:32:27 -04:00
AnachronautandClaude Opus 5 773b0f8add Put CosmOS on the screen without changing a line of it
The console is now a display controller as well as a port: it owns a font, keeps a cursor,
handles newline, carriage return, backspace and wrapping, and scrolls. That is an ordinary
kind of chip - it is what a video terminal's character generator did - and it is the reason
this rung needed no changes to CosmOS at all. CosmOS already writes bytes to port 0x00.

It writes to BOTH the screen and standard output, which is deliberate. A machine with a
screen and a serial line is an ordinary machine, the emulator's standard output is that
serial line, and one console drives both. It is also what keeps all 165 recorded results
passing under Voyager, and what makes --screen work on the plain SplitBit: there is one
console and it drives everything it has.

Scrolling moves the video device's origin and no memory. The row arriving at the bottom is
cleared because the map is a ring and it holds what was there 128 rows ago; the rows going
off the top are not, and that is a hundred rows of scrollback nothing had to keep. The test
reads the register back rather than looking at the screen, because a console blitting rows
instead would look identical and cost twelve percent of a frame for every line printed.

The font is vendored from Hatchet-GPU with a note saying where it came from, since that
repository is not part of this one. 135 glyphs in ASCII order, which is the thing that makes
it worth keeping - PETSCII's whole inconvenience was that its order was not ASCII's, so a
machine using it needed a translation table in front of every string. Here the machine
subtracts 32. It is stored one bit a pixel and expanded into tile memory at reset: 1,088
bytes against 16 kilobytes.

Voyager gets a keyboard. A window has no standard input, and a machine blocking on it inside
a frame would stop drawing and stop answering, so a front end with a window installs a hook
that the console calls while it has nothing: it keeps the window alive and hands back a key.
The hook has to tell "nobody has typed yet", which happens sixty times a second, apart from
"the window has gone", which is the end of input - one value for both would have made the
first keystroke look like a closed machine. In line mode the console echoes what it is
given, because there is no terminal behind a window to do it and that was always the
terminal's job.

Tests/video.sh grew from 14 checks to 26, half of them about the console rather than the
device: those programs ask the video device for nothing and write bytes to port 0x00 like
every SplitBit program always has. Verified by breaking two things - removing the scroll
failed exactly the two checks about scrolling, and removing the cursor advance failed
exactly the three that depend on it.

Two video checks had quietly depended on palette entry 0 being black, which stopped being
true the moment a machine woke up able to show text. They now set what they are about to
look at, and a new check pins the waking state itself.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01E2JrLzFvuFX9fgi1LDRjrW
2026-08-28 22:26:27 -04:00
AnachronautandClaude Opus 5 83623a3df3 Give the Voyager a screen
A tile engine on ports 0x30 to 0x3F, bringing one bank of video memory registered the way
the disk's buffer is. The CPU writes cell indices and the device turns them into pixels,
which is the whole reason a screen is affordable at a megahertz: a frame is 16,667 cycles,
a full 320 by 200 picture is 64,000 bytes, and a 40 by 25 map is 2,000. A program that
changes two cells writes four bytes. The cost of a screen becomes the number of cells that
changed rather than the number of pixels on it.

Which makes colour depth free, so the tiles are eight bits: an 8 by 8 cell is 64 pixels and
each picks independently out of 256 colours, with no per-cell limit of the kind that made a
Spectrum two and C64 multicolour four. The low nibble of a cell's attribute is ADDED to
every index in its tile, sixteen at a time, so a tile drawn in 0 to 15 appears in any of
sixteen schemes without a second copy in tile memory - and a tile wanting all 256 leaves the
nibble at zero and gets them. Neither use costs the other anything.

Two decisions are arithmetic rather than taste, and both come from the machine having no
multiply. A map row is a page whether the mode fills it or not, so a cell address is the row
number as the high byte and the doubled column as the low byte with no arithmetic at all;
otherwise every cursor move on a 40 column screen would cost a row-times-40 in software. And
a palette entry is four bytes rather than three, so entry n is at n times four, a shift.

THE MAP IS A RING and the Scroll register says which of its 128 rows is on top. Scrolling
moves a register and no memory: blitting a 40 by 25 screen up one line is 1,920 bytes inside
one bank, which is twelve percent of a frame even with the controller widened, and a program
printing one page would spend six frames shuffling memory. It is now one port write - and
the rows that scrolled off are still there, which is where a terminal gets scrollback it
never had.

The device is part of the machine rather than part of the window. It renders into a buffer
that is a pure function of video memory, so the same program draws the same picture with
nobody watching; Voyager puts that buffer on the glass and decides nothing. Both binaries
take --screen, which saves a PPM when the machine stops, and that is what makes a screen
checkable on a host with no display at all.

Tests/video.sh checks fourteen named behaviours rather than comparing a recorded image,
because a recorded image would say "something changed" and leave which of the palette, the
tile, the attribute, the map or the scroll register broke to be found by hand. Verified by
breaking three things in turn: the additive nibble failed exactly one check, the scroll
origin exactly two, and moving every cell one pixel sideways exactly the four about
placement.

Tests/docs.sh could not count past nine, which is how a suite of ten scripts reported
itself as wrong for the wrong reason.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01E2JrLzFvuFX9fgi1LDRjrW
2026-08-28 22:11:13 -04:00