Files
SplitBit-Emulator/Tests/expected/cosmosDrives.out
T
AnachronautandClaude Opus 5 2abc8281df Loops, and the scripting language is a language
while and for. Both only mean anything in a script, because a loop goes back to
the line that opened it and a prompt has no line to go back to - and both say so
rather than doing something surprising.

THE SCRIPT READER KEEPS THE POSITION OF EVERY LINE before reading it, which is
what makes any of this possible: by the time a line has been read the reader is
past it, and a line is not a fixed size to subtract. Three words per line, and
the block is read again on the way back so the pointer into it means what it
meant - the same thing nesting one script inside another already did, for a
different reason.

THE TWO LOOPS END DIFFERENTLY, and that is the design rather than an accident. A
while is taken away at its end and its own line asks the question again, so
nothing has to be remembered. A for is not: how many words it has used is kept
in the block, and its line reads itself again and counts one more off the front.
That is a byte in a block instead of a copy of the word list in every one of
them.

Blocks grew from a byte to a record of sixteen - state, kind, words used, and
where the line that opened it was - and sixteen because A and B are a shift
register, so four rotations turn a block number into its offset. The history and
the variables are addressed the same way for the same reason.

Nested loops, an if inside a loop, a loop inside a branch nobody takes, and a for
with no words: the last two run no times rather than once, which is the case
worth having a test for.

Three things found by running it:

textSame asks whether two WHOLE strings are the same, so "in red green blue" is
not "in". The word has to be split off before it is compared.

A for typed at a prompt complained about while, because both arrive at the same
place. One message that names neither is better than one that names the wrong
one.

And docs.sh caught a naming convention nobody had written down: it recognises a
packed name by its label ending in "Name", so ForName2 was silently not counted.
It failed the right way round - saying the run was shorter than the count claims
rather than passing - but the convention now lives where the names are and not
only in the checker.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01E2JrLzFvuFX9fgi1LDRjrW
2026-09-01 20:50:05 -04:00

49 lines
1.0 KiB
Plaintext

CosmOS
> drive
0
> dir
greet.sbx 211
hello.sbx 53
Life.sbx 1396
Snake.sbx 2164
Keys.sbx 664
Say.sbx 156
Break.sbx 149
Grid.sbx 559
Press.sbx 872
Mode.sbx 48
Crash.sbx 632
vars.script 50
blocks.script 343
loops.script 272
tune.sbx 306
notes.txt 21
Apps <dir>
hi.script 121
bad.script 45
plain.script 24
cross.script 280
nonl.script 38
outer.script 376
inner.script 44
loop.script 35
24 files, 1 directory
> drive 1
> dir
other.txt 28
notes <dir>
2things <dir>
twoblocks.txt 560
2 files, 2 directories
> cd /notes
/notes> drive 0
> drive 1
/notes> drive 0
> drive 1
/notes> drive 3
drive: this machine has no such drive
/notes> exit
halted
Execution halted.
[exit 0]