A five instruction program that writes one port and exits has no Data Segment at all, and the loader stopped the machine dead on it. It asked the memory controller to move a segment of no bytes, and a length of zero asks for the whole 64K - which is the machine's rule, and a reasonable one, since two bytes cannot say 65536 and a transfer of nothing is not usually what anybody meant. It is exactly what was meant here. 64K did not fit, the controller refused, and the load stopped half done. ON A TERMINAL THAT PRINTS A FAULT WITH AN ADDRESS. Behind a window it is a frozen picture and no reason at all, which is how it was found and is a separate problem from this one. The header says how long each segment is, so the loader knows before it asks. Both bytes are already in hand, so the test costs one OR. Nothing is lost by skipping the transfer: a blit leaves the controller's addresses past whatever it touched, and a blit of nothing would have left them where they already are, which is where the vectors are read from next. Guarded for the code segment too. A program with no code is equally assemblable and would have stopped in exactly the same place. Mode.sbx is the fix's test and a program worth having on its own: forty columns or eighty, whichever the screen is not in, which is what a person wanting Snake drawn twice the size actually needs. Ten instructions and no data, deliberately - it prints its two digits a register at a time rather than from a string, so it stays the smallest shape a loadable program can take. Nothing else on that disk had ever been that shape, which is why nothing had ever tried it. Reported by the user, who wrote the program. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01E2JrLzFvuFX9fgi1LDRjrW
6 lines
62 B
Plaintext
6 lines
62 B
Plaintext
Mode
|
|
echo a narrow screen
|
|
Mode
|
|
echo and a wide one again
|
|
exit
|