-S was added without a row in the Assembler Manual, and the usage it
printed listed a bare "-S <file>" with no long name and no statement of
what the file is for. That is not merely incomplete, it is misleading:
"-S <file>" reads just as naturally as "dump the symbols of <file>", and
asking for it that way hands the source to -S, leaves nothing positional
behind it, and is answered with "No source file specified" on a command
line that plainly names a source. The error described the hole the
mistake left and hid the mistake.
So the usage now prints the long names, says outright that every <file>
is a path it writes and the source is the last argument on its own, and
ends with a whole example command. When the source is missing and a
file-taking option was given, the error says which options take a path
to write. The manual gains the -S row it never had, a warning in the
same words, and a sentence on what a symbol dump is for.
Documenting it twice is how it went wrong once, so docs.sh now settles
both against getopt's own option table: every option the assembler takes
has a row in the manual and a line in its own usage. Verified with
break.sh against the manual row and the usage line separately.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01E2JrLzFvuFX9fgi1LDRjrW
AnachronautandClaude Opus 5
7a55cfe151